Search Results for "State Police Complaints Authority"

1112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka hears a writ petition challenging the assignment of investigation to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office under Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013. The petition raises issues regarding the permissibility of parallel investigation and violation of natural justice principles.

The petitioner, Exalogic Solutions Private Limited, a one person company incorporated in 2014, sought to quash an order dated 31-01-2024 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Quashing of FIR in Airport Trespass Case — Mala Fides Cannot Be Decided at Nascent Stage of Investigation. IPC Offences Can Coexist with Aircraft Act Offences; Section 12B Does Not Bar FIR Registration.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the State of Jharkhand against a judgment of the Jharkhand High Court quashing FIR No.169 of 2022 register...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Caste-Based Intent. Allegations of Outraging Modesty and Caste Abuse Found Vague, Not Attracting Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellants, Yogesh Laxman Pandav, Savita Laxman Pandav, and Laxman Totaram Pandav, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Missing Husband — No Custodial Detention Found. Court holds that habeas corpus is not maintainable when the alleged detenu is not in police custody and his whereabouts are unknown.

The petitioner, Usharani, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the police auth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...