Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

1595 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1595 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Bidders to Be from SC/ST Community. Condition Held Valid as Affirmative Action for Upliftment of SC/ST Communities, Not Violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, eleven pump manufacturing companies, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a tend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Trustees’ Authority in Managing Encroached Land for Slum Rehabilitation: Bombay High Court Clarifies. Bombay High Court allows PLAINTIFFS to collaborate with developers to undertake slum rehabilitation on its encroached lands, empowering trustees under the Public Trust Act.

1. Introduction:The plaintiffs, A. H. Wadia Trust, a public charitable trust, along with its trustees (Plaintiffs No. 2 to 5), approached the court vi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Gunthewari Regularization Dispute. Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred Under Section 18 of Maharashtra Gunthewari Development Act, 2001 for Challenging Regularization Order Under Section 3 of the Act.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.185 of 2015 challenging an order of regularization dated 12.12.2006 passed under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Three Writ Petitions Challenging Government Orders and Lokayukta Charge Memoes in Basava Vasati Housing Scheme Scam Case. Court Examines Legality of Disciplinary Proceedings Under Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957 and Lokayukta Act, 1984.

Three writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka by retired engineers of Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Reference to Larger Bench in Pension Dispute of U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Employees. Preetam Singh Judgment Held Binding on State and Board Regarding Pension Scheme Implementation.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of special leave petitions arising from writ petitions filed by employees of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...