KAHC010422252008_1
17 Dec 2014...
Search Results for "partnership business"
1801 result(s) found
Found 1801 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.
17 Dec 2014On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...
- 76
High Court
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.
31 Aug 2018The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...
- 61
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Communication Rejecting Coal Import Tender Bid as Non-Responsive for Arbitrary Reasons. Subsidiary Company Cannot be Disqualified Based on Parent Company’s Contract Termination When Tender Conditions Do Not Explicitly Bar Reliance on Parent’s Experience, Under Article 14 of the Constitution.
29 Jan 2024The petitioner, a subsidiary company engaged in coal import and supply, challenged a communication by the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited rejectin...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Issuing Regular Summons in Summary Suit — Directs Fresh Summons Under Form No.4 CPC. Court Holds That in a Summary Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC, the Trial Court Must Issue Summons in Form No.4 and Cannot Suo Motu Decide Maintainability at the Stage of Issuing Summons.
13 Aug 2025The petitioner, engaged in the business of gems and jewellery, filed a suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking summary r...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decides Tax Deduction at Source Liability for Cellular Mobile Service Providers Under Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Court clarified that obligation under Section 194-H requires principal-agent relationship between payer and payee as per Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872, and payments must be for services in buying/selling goods or asset transactions, not being securities.
28 Feb 2024The Supreme Court delivered a common judgment addressing appeals by the Revenue and assessees, who were cellular mobile telephone service providers, c...
- 283
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.
1 Mar 2017The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'STREAX' Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'STREAK Street' Used for Hair Products. The court found the defendants' adoption dishonest and the marks phonetically similar, warranting restraint pending trial.
5 Mar 2025The plaintiff, Hygienic Research Institute Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Chandan an...
- 685
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Landowner's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Validity. Clause 18 of Development Agreement Held as Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Reversing High Court's Dismissal of Section 11 Application.
7 Sep 2022The dispute originated from a Development Agreement dated 29.05.2014 between the appellant landowner and respondent developer for construction of an a...
- 247
