High Court of Bombay Hears First Appeal No. 1156 of 2015 Concerning Charitable Trusts and Municipal Corporation. Appeal impugns judgment of lower authority under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 and related statutes.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "Separate Legal Entity"
1038 result(s) found
Found 1038 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act
27 Apr 2018The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Part Performance Protection Under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Denied to Purchasers for Failure to Show Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale Held Unenforceable Due to Non-Compliance with Income Tax Act, Making Performance Impossible.
21 Jan 2022The plaintiff, owner of the suit property, filed a suit for recovery of possession against the defendants who were purchasers in possession under an a...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Nominated Councillor as Leader of House in Pune Municipal Corporation. Section 19-1A of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Does Not Require Leader to Be Elected Councillor; Term 'Councillor' Includes Nominated Members.
28 Feb 2022The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the appointment of a nominated Councillor as Leader of the House in the Pune Municipal Cor...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Trades and Deficiency in Service. The Court held that the arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and negligence were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Dec 2020The case involves appeals filed by IFIN Commodities Limited (the appellant-broker) against an arbitral award that had been upheld by a Single Judge un...
- 26
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Objections to Maintainability and Limitation in Suit for Recovery of Trust Property. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Suit for Recovery of Shares by Public Charitable Trusts Not Barred by Limitation.
19 Sep 2016The case concerned a notice of motion taken out by two public charitable trusts, the J.V. Gokal Charity Trust and Shree Krishna Foundation, against Co...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Floor Test in Madhya Pradesh Assembly Amid Resignation Controversy. Governor's Power to Direct Floor Test is Not Binding on Speaker; Resignations Require Verification.
16 Mar 2020The case arose from a political crisis in Madhya Pradesh where 22 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) belonging to the Indian National Congress...
- 1046
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Arbitration Petitions in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Holds That Non-Signatories Can Be Referred to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The court applied the group of companies doctrine to refer non-signatory appellants to arbitration, finding that they were closely connected to the signatory broker and the transactions were indivisible.
7 Apr 2021The case involves four appeals filed by members of the Madgavkar family (Anil V. Madgavkar, Celsa A. Madgavkar, Ayesha A. Madgavkar, and Aakash A. Mad...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes GST Provisional Attachment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Attachment of Bank Accounts and Property Without Prior Hearing Held Invalid Under Section 79(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017.
26 Mar 2026The petitioner, Navin Vishwanathan, proprietor of M/s. Oriental Facility, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 300A of the Constitution of Ind...
- 176
High Court
Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
31 Mar 2006The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...
- 17
