Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Nominated Councillor as Leader of House in Pune Municipal Corporation. Section 19-1A of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Does Not Require Leader to Be Elected Councillor; Term 'Councillor' Includes Nominated Members.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the appointment of a nominated Councillor as Leader of the House in the Pune Municipal Corporation. The petitioner, an elected Councillor, argued that only elected Councillors could hold the position. The Court examined Section 19-1A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, which provides for the appointment of a Leader of the House, and Section 5, which defines the composition of the Corporation to include both elected and nominated Councillors. The Court held that the term 'Councillor' in Section 19-1A includes nominated Councillors, as the Act does not distinguish between elected and nominated Councillors for this purpose. The Court noted that the Leader of the House is a political position and the party in majority has the discretion to choose any Councillor, including a nominated one. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Leader of the House - Appointment of Nominated Councillor - Section 19-1A, Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - The issue was whether a nominated Councillor can be appointed as Leader of the House. The Court held that Section 19-1A does not require the Leader of the House to be an elected Councillor; the term 'Councillor' includes both elected and nominated Councillors under Section 5 of the Act. The appointment of Respondent No.1, a nominated Councillor, as Leader of the House was valid. (Paras 1, 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a nominated Councillor can be appointed as Leader of the House under section 19-1A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Bombay High Court dismissed the Writ Petition, holding that a nominated Councillor can be appointed as Leader of the House under Section 19-1A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of statutes
  • Nominated Councillor
  • Leader of the House
  • Section 19-1A Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act 1949
  • Section 5 Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act 1949
  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (Qualifications and Appointment of Nominated Councillors) Rules 2012
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (02) 28

Writ Petition No.2155 of 2021

2022-02-28

A.A. Sayed, S.G. Dige

2022:BHC-AS:4175-DB

Mr. Kapil A. Rathor a/w Mr. Harshad Mandke and Mr. Heenesh Rathod for Petitioner, Mr. Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Manjiri Parisnis for Respondent No.1, Mr. Milind Sathe a/w Mr. Pralhad Paranjape, Ms. Druti Datar for Respondent No.2, Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni for Respondent No.3, Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, Advocate General a/w Mr. P.P. Kakade, Government Pleader, Mr. Akshay Shinde, B Panel Counsel a/w Mr. R.M. Shinde, AGP for Respondent No.4

Ravindra Hemraj Dhangekar

Ganesh Madhukar Bidkar & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging the appointment of a nominated Councillor as Leader of the House in Pune Municipal Corporation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the appointment of Respondent No.1 as Leader of the House.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, an elected Councillor, contended that a nominated Councillor cannot be appointed as Leader of the House under Section 19-1A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

Issues

Whether a nominated Councillor can be appointed as Leader of the House under Section 19-1A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Leader of the House must be an elected Councillor, as the term 'Councillor' in Section 19-1A should be read to mean only elected Councillors. Respondents argued that Section 19-1A does not distinguish between elected and nominated Councillors, and the term 'Councillor' includes both under Section 5 of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The term 'Councillor' in Section 19-1A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 includes both elected and nominated Councillors, as defined in Section 5 of the Act. Therefore, a nominated Councillor is eligible to be appointed as Leader of the House.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue that falls for consideration in the present Petition is - whether a nominated Councillor can be appointed as Leader of the House under section 19-1A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. Section 5 of the said Act deals with the constitution of the Corporation. It provides that each Corporation shall consist of such number of 'elected Councillors' as mentioned in the table therein and 'nominated Councillors' not exceeding five... The term 'Councillor' in Section 19-1A includes both elected and nominated Councillors.

Procedural History

The Writ Petition was filed in 2021 challenging the appointment of Respondent No.1 as Leader of the House. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 28 February 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949: Section 5, Section 19-1A
  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (Qualifications and Appointment of Nominated Councillors) Rules, 2012: Rule 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Foreign Trade Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction. Proceedings Initiated Without Mandatory Sanction Under Section 61 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 Are Void Ab Initio.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Leave to Convict Despite Adverse Police Report, Emphasizing Right to Rehabilitation and Reintegration. Rejection based on possibility of witness threat held unsustainable when convict was on bail during trial without...