Search Results for "Project Affected Person"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Project Affected Person"

1008 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1008 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Seeking Lapse of Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; HSR Layout Scheme Fully Implemented, Acquisition Completed. Appellant's Claim for Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Rejected as Possession Taken and Third-Party Rights Created.

1 Dec 2020

The litigation arose from the acquisition of 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 146 of Agara Village for the formation of HSR Layout by the Bengaluru Develo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of NRI Assessee's Case Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Not Served and Reply Not Considered Before Centralization of Case from Mumbai to Delhi.

26 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Rajiv Saxena, a Non-Resident Indian living in Dubai since 1992, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Acquisition Cases — Non-Grant of Solatium and Interest Upheld. The Court held that Section 3J of the National Highways Act, 1956, excluding solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

3 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), considered the validity of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Sanction Variation of Town Planning Scheme. State Government's Refusal to Delete Internal Road Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant trust. The trust challenged an order dated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Tender Cancellation Case — Violation of Natural Justice as Contractor Not Heard Before Termination of Contract. The Court Held That Principles of Natural Justice Require a Hearing Before Cancelling a Contract Awarded Through Tender, Even If Financial Irregularities Are Alleged.

11 Dec 2020

The case involves appeals by the State of Uttar Pradesh against a High Court judgment that set aside the cancellation of a contract awarded to Sudhir ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Families in Village Panchayat Ward Formation. Inclusion of 18 families from Village Revadi into Village Tambi for ward formation upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 4(2) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243(g) of Constitution.

1 Sep 2010

The petitioners, Jadhav Shankar Dyandeo and Sapkal Sampat Bhau, were project-affected persons rehabilitated in Village Revadi. They sought formation o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

8 Apr 2026

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Application for Leave to Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Acquiring Body Not a Necessary Party Under Section 18 Reference Proceedings. The court held that the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, not being a party to the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, has no locus standi to seek leave to appeal against the award enhancing compensation.

27 Oct 2016

The Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) filed two civil applications seeking leave to appeal against awards passed by the reference Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied Due to Lack of Evidence. Claimants Failed to Produce Comparable Sales Evidence Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

62 63 64 65 66

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)