Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act"

848 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 848 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC's Cancellation of Plot Allotment for Non-Payment — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Payment Schedule and Conditions of Allotment.

The petitioner, Ambar Auto Engineers Pvt. Ltd., was allotted an industrial plot by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) in Nashik...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition Against GST Attachment of Secured Assets Under SARFAESI Act. Priority of Secured Creditor Over Crown Debts Upheld Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act and Section 31B of RDDB Act.

The petitioner, Indian Overseas Bank, a secured creditor, had extended credit facilities to Respondent No. 3, Savair Energy Limited. Upon default, the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Second Appeal in Part, Remands for Demarcation of Encroached Land. Dispute over ownership and encroachment of land survey no. 34/1 at Jaswantpura, Aurangabad, with conflicting claims between plaintiffs and CIDCO.

The case involves two second appeals by the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) against a common judgment of the appellate court. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows U.P. Housing Authority's Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Release Notification. Fraud by Land Owners in Obtaining Release Justifies Cancellation Without Fresh Acquisition Under Section 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against a High Court order that set aside a notification cancelling the release ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes VIDC Circular Imposing 5% TDS on Contractors Without Statutory Authority. Circular No. 9 dated 17.02.2020 directing deduction of 5% TDS from contractor bills held ultra vires the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the VIDC Act.

The petitioner, M/s Musale Constructions, a partnership firm engaged in construction business, filed three writ petitions challenging Circular No. 9 d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Street Scheme Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1969 and Completed in 1986 Cannot Be Challenged After 14 Years Without Justification.

The dispute relates to the acquisition of land bearing field Survey Nos.147/2, 153, 154/1, 2 and 3, 155, 156 and 156/1, admeasuring about 10.10 acres,...