Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC's Cancellation of Plot Allotment for Non-Payment — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Payment Schedule and Conditions of Allotment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 225
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ambar Auto Engineers Pvt. Ltd., was allotted an industrial plot by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) in Nashik. The allotment letter dated 18th March 2022 required the petitioner to pay 50% of the premium within 60 days and the balance 50% within 60 days thereafter. The petitioner paid the first installment but failed to pay the balance despite several extensions and reminders. MIDC cancelled the allotment on 30th June 2023 and forfeited the amount paid. The petitioner challenged the cancellation by way of a writ petition. The court examined the terms of the allotment letter and the correspondence between the parties. It found that the petitioner had been given multiple opportunities to pay the balance amount but failed to do so. The court held that the cancellation was not arbitrary and that the petitioner had no right to retain the plot without paying the full premium. The court also held that the forfeiture of the amount paid was in accordance with the terms of the allotment. The petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Industrial Law - Allotment of Industrial Plot - Cancellation for Non-Payment - The petitioner was allotted a plot by MIDC but failed to pay the balance 50% of the premium within the stipulated period despite several extensions. MIDC cancelled the allotment and forfeited the amount paid. The court held that the cancellation was not arbitrary as the petitioner failed to comply with the payment schedule and conditions of allotment. (Paras 1-10)

B) Contract Law - Breach of Contract - Forfeiture of Amount - The petitioner paid only 50% of the premium and did not pay the balance despite repeated reminders and extensions. The court held that the forfeiture of the amount paid was in accordance with the terms of the allotment letter and the MIDC policy. (Paras 11-15)

C) Writ Jurisdiction - Contractual Matters - Scope of Judicial Review - The court held that in matters of contract, writ jurisdiction is limited and cannot be used to enforce contractual obligations unless there is arbitrariness or violation of statutory provisions. The petitioner failed to show any illegality or arbitrariness in MIDC's action. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of allotment of an industrial plot by MIDC for non-payment of installments was arbitrary and illegal, and whether the petitioner is entitled to restoration of allotment or refund of amounts paid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The cancellation of allotment by MIDC is upheld. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Allotment of industrial plots by MIDC is contractual
  • subject to terms and conditions
  • failure to pay installments as per schedule justifies cancellation
  • no right to retain plot without payment
  • writ jurisdiction not to be used for enforcing contractual obligations without illegality.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (12) 295

Writ Petition No. 11115 of 2025 with Interim Application No. 1463 of 2025

2025-12-23

Revati Mohite Dere, Sandesh D. Patil

2025:BHC-AS:56924-DB

Atul Damle, Sachin Gite, A.I. Patel, S.P. Kamble, Milind Sathe, Vivek Yadav, Shraddha Dube-Patil, Maasar Qureshi, Veer Kankariya, Jainam Jain

Ambar Auto Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

The State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Joint Chief Executive Officer, MIDC, M/s N.T. Engineers

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of allotment of industrial plot by MIDC for non-payment of balance premium.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of cancellation order and restoration of allotment, or refund of amounts paid.

Filing Reason

MIDC cancelled the allotment of an industrial plot to the petitioner for failure to pay the balance 50% of the premium within the stipulated time.

Previous Decisions

MIDC issued allotment letter on 18th March 2022, granted extensions, and finally cancelled allotment on 30th June 2023.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of allotment by MIDC was arbitrary and illegal. Whether the petitioner is entitled to restoration of allotment or refund of amounts paid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that MIDC acted arbitrarily and that the cancellation was illegal. Respondents argued that the petitioner failed to comply with payment schedule and conditions, and cancellation was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The allotment of industrial plots by MIDC is contractual and subject to terms and conditions. Failure to pay installments as per schedule justifies cancellation. Writ jurisdiction is not to be used for enforcing contractual obligations without illegality.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner failed to pay the balance amount despite several extensions and reminders. The cancellation of allotment was not arbitrary and was in accordance with the terms of the allotment letter. Writ jurisdiction is limited in contractual matters and cannot be used to enforce obligations without illegality.

Procedural History

The petitioner was allotted a plot on 18th March 2022. After failure to pay balance, MIDC issued show cause notice and cancelled allotment on 30th June 2023. Petitioner filed writ petition in 2025. Heard on 25th November 2025 and pronounced on 23rd December 2025.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appeal for Specific Performance in Land Sale Contract; Time Not of Essence When Vendor's Title Incomplete and Sanction Required. Purchaser's Readiness and Willingness Established by Conduct, and Acceptance of Refund Decree Does ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.