Search Results for "section 326"

1086 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1086 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicles Act Case; Holds That Non-Furnishing of Information Does Not Lead to Summary Rejection of Permit Application. The Court Rules That Section 46 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 Is Not Mandatory and Transport Authority Can Call for Additional Information.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, setting aside the judgment of the Bombay High Court and resto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge Under Section 304 IPC. The court held that the blood alcohol level was within permissible limits under Section 185 MV Act and that custodial interrogation was not required.

The applicant, a female MBA graduate and businesswoman, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with a fatal hit-and-run acciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Amicable Settlement Between Parties. Court quashes FIR under Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 IPC as parties have resolved their differences and entered into consent terms.

The petitioners, Sandip Sarjerao Sule (husband), Suman Sarjerao Sule (mother-in-law), and Sunita Prakash Kale (sister-in-law), filed a criminal writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Lays Down Pan-India Guidelines Against Demolition of Properties of Accused Without Due Process. Executive Cannot Use Demolition as Punishment for Crime; Right to Shelter Protected Under Article 21.

This batch of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raised a grievance that residential and commercial properties of persons ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Acquisition Order Under Income Tax Act for Non-Application of Mind. Appropriate Authority Failed to Consider Comparable Sales in Same Building, Rendering Order Under Section 269UD(1) Invalid.

The petitioners, owners of a flat in Mumbai, entered into an agreement to sell the flat for Rs. 19 lakhs and filed Form 37-I under Chapter XX-C of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order Refusing to Condone 614-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — Petitioners Failed to Provide Sufficient Cause for Inordinate Delay.

The petitioners, Rajkumar, N.Ramesh, and R.Amutha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Lack of Material to Show Alarm or Danger in the Area — Petitioner's Criminal Activities Did Not Justify Externment Under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951

The petitioner, Mr. Masiullah Mohid Idrishi, challenged an externment order dated 27.11.2009 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone IV, Mum...