High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Bar/Restaurant Licensees Against Non-Renewal of CL-9 Excise Licenses. Petitions Challenge Communications Issued by Excise Authorities and Seek Directions to Renew Licenses.
22 Aug 2017...
Search Results for "package"
688 result(s) found
Found 688 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Revenue's Appeals Against ITAT Decision Favoring Assessee on Deduction of Distributable Surplus Payment to Brand Owner. Court Examines Whether Payment is Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 or Constitutes Application of Income or Diversion by Overriding Title.
25 Sep 2018The present set of five tax appeals arises under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Incom...
- 17
High Court
High Court of Karnataka addressed writ petitions filed by a physically disabled doctor and her mother seeking refund and compensation from Air India and a travel agent for alleged deficiency in service during a customized tour. The court heard arguments on maintainability under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and the applicability of the Montreal Convention to limit liability for delayed baggage, but the provided judgment text ends before any final decision.
25 Sep 2019The High Court of Karnataka heard two writ petitions filed by a doctor with 75% permanent physical impairment and her elderly mother, seeking refund a...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.
25 Sep 2019The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...
- 58
High Court
- 68
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Writ Petition in Part and Directs Extension of Liberalised Compensation Policy to Cooperative Landowners. Distinction Between Landowners Based on Protest Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14; Possession Taken After Enactment of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013.
25 Sep 2018The petitioners, twenty individuals engaged in agriculture and agricultural labour from Kelpani village, challenged the denial of enhanced compensatio...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Group of Petitions Seeking Reconstruction of Shops Demolished by Thane Municipal Corporation; Court Examines Whether Demolition Violated Due Process and Whether Relief of Reconstruction or Compensation is Maintainable
21 Jun 2018In a group of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners, comprising various individual shop owners and a cafeteria, alleged t...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging Mumbai Port Trust's Summary Eviction Notices Under Bye-law No.9. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Bye-law No.9 Ultra Vires Public Premises Act and Violated Natural Justice.
27 Mar 2018In a batch of writ petitions, occupants of structures at Reay Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged eviction notices issued by the Mumbai Port Trust on 06...
- 45
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Commercial Appeals Against Ad-Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement Suit Over Film Song; Directs Strict Compliance of Registration Procedures by Original Side Registry
28 Aug 2017The appeal arose from an ad-interim injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff in a copyright infringement suit concerning the song 'Kah Doon Tumhe...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Answers Sales Tax Reference in Favor of Dealer, Allowing Resale Deduction Under Section 8(2) of Bombay Sales Tax Act Despite Purchases from Exempted Dealers. Court Holds That Exemption Conditions in Entry 39(a) Schedule A Do Not Estop Purchasing Dealer from Claiming Independent Statutory Deduction.
28 Apr 2017The matter arose from a sales tax assessment of a proprietary concern engaged in reselling footwears, who was not a manufacturer and held no trademark...
- 12
