Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"

3183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cost Escalation by Development Authority in Consumer Dispute — Clause 7 of Allotment Letter Permitted Price Revision. The Court held that the allotment was not a fixed price contract and the authority acted fairly by granting interest on deposits.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 8 November 2017, which had directed the Visakhap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Finding. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act When Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation Due to Title Dispute.

The Supreme Court heard two appeals arising from a Delhi High Court order concerning land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1989-1992. The responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Protection of Sacred Groves/Orans in Rajasthan as Deemed Forests Under Forest Conservation Act, 1980. Recognizes Ecological and Cultural Significance of Community-Conserved Forests and Balances Community Rights with Conservation Goals.

The Supreme Court of India was hearing an interlocutory application in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India writ petition, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 When Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Court Stay, and Stay Period Must Be Excluded from Five-Year Computation.

The dispute originated from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondent landowner filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows CMDA Appeal in Premium FSI Charges Dispute — Guideline Value Prevailing on Date of Approval Governs Levy. Builder's Application for Additional FSI Does Not Confer Right to Pre-Revised Rate.

The appellant, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), challenged the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court which directe...