Search Results for "Criminal Procedure Code Section 468"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Criminal Procedure Code Section 468"

876 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 876 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Case Due to Civil Dispute and Omnibus Allegations — Criminal Proceedings Held to Be Abuse of Process When Predominantly Civil in Nature. The court found that the FIR lacked specific particulars and was filed to pressurize the appellants in a property dispute, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

4 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the FIR and chargesheet against the appellants. The case arose from a complaint filed by respondent n...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Invalid Service of Demand Notice. Notice sent by speed post but not delivered to correct address; court holds that service of notice is mandatory under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

12 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Salim s/o Jilani Qureshi, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ED Summons Issued Under PMLA to Accused in Predicate Offence Cases — Summons Under Section 50 PMLA Cannot Be Issued to Persons Not Named in ECIR or Arrested Under PMLA

23 Feb 2023

The petitioners, Naresh Goyal and Anita Naresh Goyal, filed two separate criminal writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Green Card Holder to Travel Abroad During Bail, Balancing Right to Travel with Conditions of Bail. The court held that the High Court erred in refusing permission solely on the ground of an FIR being registered, without considering the appellant's consistent travel history and the risk of losing his Green Card.

7 Aug 2020

The appellant, Parvez Noordin Lokhandawalla, an Indian citizen and US Green Card holder since 2010, has resided in the US since 1985. A private compla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Contempt of Courts Act Provisions as Unconstitutional — Petitioner's Allegations of Violation of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights Rejected. Court holds that Sections 2(c), 12, 14 and 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are not unconstitutional and that the contempt proceedings against the petitioner are not liable to be quashed.

4 May 2017

The petitioner, Satish Mahadeorao Uke, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Public View and Malafide Prosecution. Allegations of caste-based insults failed as incidents occurred in private settings, not in public view, under Sections 3(1)(viii), 3(1)(ix), 3(2)(ii) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

30 Mar 2010

The applicant, Kamlakar Ratnakar Shenoy, filed three criminal applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Government Engineers in Cheque Dishonour Case — Absence of Vicarious Liability Under Negotiable Instruments Act. Directors or Employees Not Named in Complaint Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act Without Specific Allegations of Role in Company Affairs.

18 Nov 2017

The judgment concerns four criminal applications filed by government engineers (Avinash Trimbakrao Dhondage, Shankar Vitthalrao Totawar, Mohan Vasantr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against Accused in Private Complaint — Complaint Filed Beyond Limitation Period Without Proper Application for Condonation of Delay. The court held that the trial court's order taking cognizance under Section 500 IPC was illegal as the complaint was filed beyond the one-year limitation under Section 468 CrPC without any application for condonation of delay.

28 Nov 2023

The petitioners, accused in C.C.No.820/2022 on the file of Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Navalgund, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to qua...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

3 Oct 2012

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Condonation of Delay in Food Adulteration Complaints — Delay Caused by Referral to Second Analyst Held Reasonable. The court upheld the Magistrate's order condoning delay under Section 468 CrPC, finding that the time taken for second analysis under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 constituted a reasonable cause.

14 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Sakhahari Vyankatrao Borlepawar, a vendor and partner of M/s Pravin Agencies, filed four criminal writ petitions challenging a common ...

61 62 63 64 65

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)