Search Results for "Affidavit verification"

1713 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1713 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Setting Aside Appointment in Municipal Service Recruitment. Selection Committee's Relaxation of Time for Production of Non-Creamy Layer Certificate Upheld as Valid.

The petitioner, Diksha Babanrao Shirsat, challenged an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 19.1.2022, which allowed th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Madgi Scheduled Caste Claim Due to Non-Consideration of Relevant Documents. Committee Failed to Consider Primary School Record and Caste Certificates Issued by Competent Authority, Rendering Order Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Rajanna Ganganna Rashalawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12.05.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Non-Appointment as District Judge Due to Criminal Antecedents. Court upholds High Court's decision that acquittal does not automatically entitle a candidate to judicial appointment, as suitability includes character assessment.

The petitioner, Khushalchand Bhairulal Varma, applied for the post of District Judge in Maharashtra pursuant to an advertisement dated 28 July 2008. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be Ignored by Revisional Authority.

The petitioners, residents of Village Chas (kaman), Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...