Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate for Thakur Tribe — Failure to Consider Relevant Documents and Affidavits of Relatives Constitutes Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that contemporaneous school records and affidavits must be considered by the Scrutiny Committee while verifying caste claims under the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order 1950.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Chetan Prabhakar Rajwade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13th April 2018 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nasik Division, which invalidated his caste certificate certifying him as belonging to the Thakur Scheduled Tribe. The petitioner claimed that he was born into the Thakur tribe, recognized as a Scheduled Tribe under the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order 1950, and had been issued a caste certificate on 9th June 1992 by the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Kalvan. He submitted his certificate for verification to the Scrutiny Committee, which after inquiry passed the impugned order invalidating his claim. The petitioner contended that the Committee failed to consider relevant documents, including school records of his father, uncle, and himself, as well as affidavits of relatives, which were contemporaneous evidence supporting his claim. The respondents argued that the Committee had conducted a thorough inquiry and found the claim not genuine. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the Committee had not considered the school records of the petitioner's father and uncle, which were from 1965 and 1967 respectively, and the petitioner's own school record from 1992, all showing the caste as Thakur. The court also noted that the affidavits of relatives were not considered. The court held that the Committee's failure to consider these relevant documents and affidavits vitiated the order. The court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to the Scrutiny Committee for fresh consideration, directing the Committee to consider all documents and affidavits and pass a reasoned order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Constitution of India - Scheduled Tribe Certificate - Validity of Caste Claim - The petitioner challenged the order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating his Thakur tribe certificate. The court held that the Committee failed to consider relevant documents including school records of the petitioner and his relatives, and affidavits of relatives, which were contemporaneous evidence supporting the claim. The order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration. (Paras 1-10)

B) Natural Justice - Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny - Consideration of Evidence - The court held that the Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant documents and affidavits submitted by the claimant. Failure to do so amounts to violation of principles of natural justice. The Committee's order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after giving opportunity of hearing. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 13th April, 2018 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste claim as belonging to Thakur Scheduled Tribe is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned judgment and order dated 13th April 2018 passed by the Respondent No. 2 – Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nasik Division, Nasik is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Scrutiny Committee for fresh consideration. The Committee shall consider all documents and affidavits submitted by the petitioner and pass a reasoned order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petition is allowed. Rule made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Scheduled Tribe certificate verification
  • burden of proof
  • consideration of contemporaneous documents
  • validity of caste claim
  • Thakur tribe
  • Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order 1950
  • Article 226
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (03) 46

Civil Writ Petition No. 3197 of 2019

2020-03-17

S. S. Shinde, V. G. Bisht

2020:BHC-AS:6683-DB

Mr. R. K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner, Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP for Respondent – State, Mr. Pramod N. Joshi for Respondent No. 4

Chetan Prabhakar Rajwade

The State of Maharashtra, Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nasik, Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nasik, Nasik Education Society

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste certificate.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned order dated 13th April 2018 and direction to the Scrutiny Committee to verify the petitioner's tribe certificate as belonging to Thakur Scheduled Tribe.

Filing Reason

The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's caste certificate without considering relevant documents and affidavits.

Previous Decisions

The Scrutiny Committee passed the impugned order on 13th April 2018 invalidating the petitioner's caste claim.

Issues

Whether the impugned order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste claim is sustainable in law. Whether the Committee failed to consider relevant documents and affidavits, thereby violating principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Committee did not consider school records of his father, uncle, and himself, and affidavits of relatives, which were contemporaneous evidence supporting his Thakur tribe claim. Respondents argued that the Committee conducted a thorough inquiry and found the claim not genuine.

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant documents and affidavits submitted by the claimant while verifying a caste claim. Failure to consider contemporaneous evidence such as school records and affidavits of relatives vitiates the order and amounts to violation of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

It is the case of the Petitioner that, Petitioner by birth belongs to Thakur tribe which is recognized as Scheduled Tribe under Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 as amended from time to time. The petitioner was therefore granted caste certificate dated 09.06.1992 by the competent authority i.e. Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Kalvan, Dist. Nasik certifying that the Petitioner belongs to Thakur tribe which is recognized as Scheduled Tribe. The Committee failed to consider the school records of the petitioner's father and uncle, which were from 1965 and 1967 respectively, and the petitioner's own school record from 1992, all showing the caste as Thakur.

Procedural History

The petitioner was granted a caste certificate on 9th June 1992. He submitted it to the Scrutiny Committee for verification. The Committee passed an order on 13th April 2018 invalidating the claim. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court, which was heard and decided on 17th March 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate for Thakur Tribe — Failure to Consider Relevant Documents and Affidavits of Relatives Constitutes Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that contempo...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Stamp Duty Deficiency — Maintainability of Writ Under Article 227 Against Interlocutory Orders of Arbitral Tribunal. The court held that a writ petition under Article...