Search Results for "statutory notice requirements"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "statutory notice requirements"

3574 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3574 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Revision in Eviction Suit, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Subletting and Bona Fide Need. Court holds that appellate court failed to properly consider evidence of subletting and that the tenant's claim of part performance under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was not established.

15 Jul 2019

The applicants, original plaintiffs and landlords, filed an eviction suit against the sole defendant-tenant in the Court of Small Causes at Bombay. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Due to Lack of Proper Verification and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the Magistrate failed to record verification of the complainant and did not apply judicial mind before issuing process, rendering the proceedings illegal.

3 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Nazim Karim Mumbrawala, was the original accused in four complaints filed by respondent No.1, Keshava Prasad H. A., under Section 138 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Filing of Revised Income Tax Returns After Due Date in Amalgamation Case — Holds That NCLT-Approved Scheme Overrides Procedural Timelines Under Income Tax Act. Clause 64(c) of the Scheme Permitting Revised Returns Has Statutory Force and Department Cannot Reject Them as Invalid.

18 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by M/s Dalmia Power Limited and M/s Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited against the judgment of the Division Be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging PMLA Attachment — Section 32A IBC Immunity Overrides Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA. Resolution Plan Approved for Corporate Debtor Shields Assets from Enforcement Directorate's Attachment.

1 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by individuals (Shiv Charan, Pushpalata Bai, and Bharti Agarwal) challenging a provisional attachment or...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Maintainability of Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC and Examines Plaintiff’s Readiness and Willingness in Suit for Specific Performance of Agricultural Land Sale Agreement; Trial Court Had Dismissed Specific Performance but Directed Refund of Advance with Interest

3 Mar 2015

The appeal arose from the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2014 in O.S. No.1/2011 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Tiptur, partly decreeing t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Consolidated Writ Appeals Challenging Acquisition Proceedings by Bangalore Development Authority. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act against the Single Judge's order dated 06.06.2006 that upheld the preliminary and final notifications for acquisition of lands.

3 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order and Remands Dispute in No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Proper service of notice on all panchayat members is mandatory, and disputed duty of service necessitated fresh inquiry to determine if actual or alternate service was effected as per Bombay Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Upasarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975.

23 Sep 2016

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Upa-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Belgaon Tarale, Taluka Igatpuri, District Nashik. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

Bombay High Court considers rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 and Order XXIII CPC in suit by trustee alleging siphoning of funds from trust. Defendants seek dismissal on grounds of forgery, abuse of process, and frivolous pleadings.

24 Mar 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

6 Apr 2010

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...

60 61 62 63 64

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)