ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 56 OF 2013
4 Apr 2013...
Search Results for "letter evidence"
7938 result(s) found
Found 7938 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Revokes Leave to Sue in Summary Suit for Goods Sold and Delivered Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Article 39 of the contract required all legal proceedings only in Calcutta High Court, ousting Bombay High Court's jurisdiction.
10 Feb 2006The Plaintiff, Pacific Refractories Ltd., filed a summary suit in the Bombay High Court against the Defendant, Stein Heurtey India Projects Pvt. Ltd.,...
- 122
High Court
High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition for Interim Relief and Arbitrator Appointment in Redevelopment Dispute -- Section 9 and Section 11 of Arbitration Act Applications Denied
23 Jan 2026The High Court dismissed both petitions filed by Petitioner against Respondents -- The Petitioner sought interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbit...
- 1109
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of NOC for Mining Activities — Forest Department Cannot Revoke No Objection Certificate Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing and Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that withdrawal of NOC without notice and hearing is arbitrary and violative of natural justice under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
21 Apr 2026The petitioner, Mr. H.K. Lakshman Gowda, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Kar...
- 126
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Vice-Chancellor for Violation of Natural Justice — Suspension Order Set Aside as Chancellor Acted Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing Under Section 14 of Visvesvaraya Technological University Act, 1994. The court held that the power to suspend a Vice-Chancellor must be exercised in accordance with principles of natural justice, and failure to provide a hearing renders the order invalid.
28 Apr 2016The petitioner, Prof. H. Maheshappa, was appointed as Vice-Chancellor of Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU) on 30.06.2010 for a period of thr...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross-Writ Petitions and Upholds Tribunal’s Compensation to Illegally Terminated Incharge Principal in Educational Trust Dispute. Termination Without Enquiry Held Illegal, but Reinstatement Denied as Post Was Temporary and a Regular Principal Had Been Appointed Under University Statutes.
9 Nov 2006The case involved cross-writ petitions arising from the order of the College Tribunal for Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, which partly a...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit by Cotton Corporation Against Textile Mill for Unpaid Price of Imported Cotton. Court holds that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the principal sum with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of suit till payment.
8 Aug 2005The plaintiff, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, a government undertaking and canalising agency for import of cotton, filed a suit for recovery of ...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Refund of Transfer Fees Paid Under Coercion. Payment of 3% of consideration as transfer fees disguised as repair fund contribution held illegal and recoverable with interest under Section 22 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
17 Feb 2010The petitioner, Bharatiya Bhavan Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged the orders of the First Cooperative Court and the Maharashtra State C...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Workman to be Represented by Lawyer in Domestic Enquiry When Presenting Officer is Legally Trained and Facts are Complex. The court held that under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, a workman is entitled to legal representation if the presenting officer is legally trained and the facts are not simple.
25 Feb 2010The Petitioner, an employee of Respondent No.1 since 1979, was served a charge-sheet on 8th July 2009 for alleged misbehavior and threats to an office...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Time Bar Clause. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that the petitioner failed to raise dispute within 30 days was based on evidence and not perverse, and demurrage was not conditional on indemnity.
30 Jun 2005The case arises from a contract between Larsen & Toubro Limited (petitioner) and Sunfield Resources Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) for the supply of steaming ...
- 165
