Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Refund of Transfer Fees Paid Under Coercion. Payment of 3% of consideration as transfer fees disguised as repair fund contribution held illegal and recoverable with interest under Section 22 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Bharatiya Bhavan Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged the orders of the First Cooperative Court and the Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate Court directing refund of an amount paid by respondent No.1, Smt. Krishna H. Bajaj, as transfer fees. The respondent had purchased shares and premises from Mrs. Preeti Umesh Khimji in March 1992 for Rs.3.21 Crores. The agreement required both parties to contribute 3% of the consideration towards transfer fees. The respondent paid this amount to the society, which was credited to the Repair & Maintenance Fund, and was subsequently granted membership and share certificates between April and July 1992. In August 1994, the respondent, through her advocate, challenged the payment as illegal and made under coercion, demanding refund with interest. The society refused, leading to a dispute before the Cooperative Court, which partly allowed the claim for refund with 12% interest. The society's appeal to the Appellate Court was dismissed. The High Court, in this writ petition, upheld the lower courts' findings, holding that the demand for transfer fees was illegal and the payment was made under coercion, as the society had withheld membership transfer until payment. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the refund with interest.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Transfer Fees - Coercion - Section 22 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The issue pertained to whether a payment of 3% of the sale consideration made by a transferee-member to the society as transfer fees, under the guise of a repair fund contribution, was illegal and made under coercion. The court held that the demand was illegal and the payment was made under coercion, as the society refused to transfer membership without such payment. The transferee was entitled to refund with interest at 12% per annum from the date of payment. (Paras 1-5)

B) Cooperative Law - Refund - Interest - Section 22 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The court upheld the orders of the Cooperative Court and the Appellate Court directing refund of the amount paid as transfer fees with interest at 12% p.a., as the payment was made under coercion and the society had no authority to demand such fees. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the payment of 3% of the consideration amount as transfer fees, disguised as a contribution to the Repair & Maintenance Fund, was made under coercion and is recoverable with interest.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the orders of the Cooperative Court and the Appellate Court directing the Society to refund the amount of Rs. 9,63,000 (3% of Rs. 3.21 Crores) with interest at 12% per annum from the date of payment.

Law Points

  • Coercion
  • Transfer fees
  • Cooperative housing society
  • Refund with interest
  • Section 22 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (02) 34

Writ Petition No.1094 of 2004

2010-02-17

Smt. Roshan Dalvi, J.

Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Sr. Counsel i/b. Mr. M.N.Bhadrashete for Petitioners; Mr. Zal Andhyarujina with Ms. Duhita Lewis i/b. M/s Goenka Law.Asso. for Respondent No.1

Bharatiya Bhavan Cooperative Housing Society Limited & Anr.

Smt. Krishna H. Bajaj & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging orders of Cooperative Court and Appellate Court directing refund of transfer fees paid under coercion.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (Society) sought to set aside the orders directing refund of Rs. 9,63,000 (3% of Rs. 3.21 Crores) with interest.

Filing Reason

The Society demanded and received 3% of the sale consideration as transfer fees disguised as repair fund contribution; the respondent claimed it was paid under coercion.

Previous Decisions

First Cooperative Court partly allowed the dispute for refund with 12% interest; Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate Court dismissed the Society's appeal.

Issues

Whether the payment of 3% of consideration as transfer fees was illegal and made under coercion. Whether the respondent is entitled to refund of the amount with interest.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the payment was voluntary and towards repair fund, not transfer fees. Respondent argued that the payment was coerced as the society refused to transfer membership without such payment.

Ratio Decidendi

A cooperative housing society cannot demand transfer fees as a condition for membership transfer; any payment made under such coercion is recoverable with interest.

Judgment Excerpts

The Respondent challenged the receipt of the amount representing 3% of the consideration amount towards transfer fees as illegal demand for transfer fees having been paid under coercion in the guise and name of the building repair and maintenance fund... The learned Cooperative Court partly allowed the dispute for refund of the amount paid to the Society under coercion with interest at 12% p.a thereon.

Procedural History

Respondent filed dispute before First Cooperative Court (C.C.No.1/1222/94) which partly allowed refund with interest. Society appealed to Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate Court, which dismissed the appeal. Society then filed Writ Petition No.1094 of 2004 before Bombay High Court, which was dismissed.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 22
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Tractor Insurer Not Liable for Trolley Accident. The court held that the insurer of a tractor is not liable for compensation for death caused by a trolley attached to ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Refund of Transfer Fees Paid Under Coercion. Payment of 3% of consideration as transfer fees disguised as repair fund contribution held illegal and recoverable with inter...