Search Results for "extension agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "extension agreement"

1843 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1843 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Protected Sub-Tenancy Under Bombay Rent Act — Conducting Agreement Does Not Create Sub-Tenancy. The court held that a conducting agreement is a license and does not confer sub-tenancy rights under the Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2005

The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed a suit in the Small Causes Court, Bombay seeking a declaration that he was a protected sub-tenant of a shop ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Commercial Matter. Arbitration Act, 1996 invoked for pre-arbitral relief in a contractual dispute.

6 May 2025

This petition, filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, sought interim measures from the Bombay High Court. The petitioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Process in Public Procurement Case — MSE Policy Compliance Not Violated. Petitioner's failure to opt for MSE purchase preference on GeM portal disentitled it to preferential treatment, and no procedural irregularity was established in the reverse auction or bid price modifications.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, GTI Infotel Private Limited, an MSE entity, challenged the entire tender process of respondent No.1, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

24 May 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Strike Out Pleadings Under Order VI Rule 16 CPC. Court holds that disputed questions of fact regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract cannot be decided at the stage of striking out pleadings and require trial.

19 Mar 2024

The case involves two civil revision applications filed by the defendants (J.P. Realities Pvt. Ltd. and its director Jaiprakash Khushalani, along with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Interim Applications in Commercial Suit for Declaration and Injunction Against Bank's Auction of Secured Assets. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief as the bank's possession and auction of secured assets under SARFAESI Act were valid and not vitiated by any fraud or collusion.

5 Jun 2023

The plaintiffs, Cheerful Trade and Realty Developers Pvt Ltd and Aristo Realty Developers Ltd, both non-banking financial companies, filed a commercia...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge burden of proving the agreement and that the defendant's possession was permissive, leading to dismissal of the suit.

10 Sep 2015

The appellants (defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2015 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nelamangala, in O.S. No. 82/2010, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Construction Contract Dispute. The court held that the arbitration clause covered the disputes and that the petitioner made out a prima facie case for interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Generic Engineering Construction and Projects Ltd., filed Commercial Arbitration Application No. 675 of 2025 under Section 11 of the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...

60 61 62 63 64

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)