Search Results for "arbitral award execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitral award execution"

953 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 953 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor. The Court held that payment accepted under protest does not amount to accord and satisfaction, and an exclusion clause cannot bar claims for damages caused by the employer's own breach under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Sep 2017

The case arises from a construction contract between Vilayati Ram Mittal (P) Ltd. (the claimant/appellant) and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI/responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Section 34 Applications Under Arbitration Act from District Court to High Court for Consolidated Hearing. Transfer Ordered Under Section 24 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Conflicting Decisions in Arbitration Matters.

15 Mar 2013

The applicant, Atlanta Limited, a public limited company, filed this application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Chit Fund Dispute — Holds That Chit Funds Act Does Not Bar Arbitration of Disputes Under Chit Agreements. The Court Ruled That Section 64 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 Does Not Impliedly Exclude Arbitration, and the Arbitrator Had Jurisdiction to Decide the Claims.

28 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Dinesh Jaya Poojary, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession in Property Dispute Between Brothers. Consent Decree and Subsequent Transfers Bar Reopening of Title Under Section 9A CPC.

18 Oct 2013

The plaintiff, Naresh Lachmandas Aswani, filed a suit against his brother Haridas (defendant no.1) and two companies (defendant nos.2 and 3) seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter, Restores Arbitral Award. Court holds that Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, does not permit reappreciation of evidence or substitution of the arbitrator's view, and the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction by setting aside the award on merits.

14 Jun 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment dated 29th July 2015, whereby the learn...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Reference Dispute Over Lease Rent Sharing. Dispute Between Society and Members Arising from Development Agreements Falls Within Arbitration Clause 19 of Addendum.

6 Sep 2019

The case involves a dispute between M/s Avinash Hitech City 2 Society and its members (appellants) and Boddu Manikya Malini and another (respondents) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Coal Supply Dispute Due to Absence of Arbitration Agreement in Purchase Orders. Tax Invoices with Arbitration Clause Not Binding as They Were Unilateral and Not Accepted by Respondent.

5 May 2026

The applicant, Hitesh Coal Traders, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petition Filed Beyond Three-Month Limitation Period Without Sufficient Cause for Delay.

4 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Adityasai Cotspin Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in the Bombay High C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Amendment Application in Arbitration Challenge Due to Delay and Lack of Diligence. Petitioner Failed to Explain 17-Month Delay in Seeking to Add New Ground Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Jan 2017

The Petitioner, Zee Sports Limited (now Zee Digital Convergence Ltd.), filed a Chamber Summons seeking amendment to its Arbitration Petition under Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Amendment Application in Arbitration Challenge Due to Delay and Lack of Diligence. Petitioner Failed to Show Justification for Incorporating New Ground 17 Months After Filing Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Jan 2017

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Zee Sports Limited (now Zee Digital Convergence Ltd.) seeking amendment to its Arbitration Petition chall...

60 61 62 63 64

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)