Search Results for "statement under Section 131"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "statement under Section 131"

1048 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1048 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Discharge of Advocate in Abetment of Suicide Case — Filing of Multiple Legal Cases Does Not Constitute Abetment Under Section 306 IPC. The court held that without direct evidence of instigation, the accused cannot be compelled to face trial for abetment of suicide based solely on the filing of multiple cases over 17 years.

14 Sep 2021

The petitioner, S. Sadashivappa, an advocate, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging the order dated 15-03-2017 passed by the II...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Letter of Credit Dispute in Common Judgment for Two Suits Arising from Alleged Discrepant Documents. Bank's Liability for Wrongful Debit Examined Under UCP 290 with Emphasis on Strict Compliance and Discrepancy in Shipping Documents.

18 Dec 2006

Two suits were filed arising from a documentary import Letter of Credit facility granted by State Bank of India to Dadlani Silk Stores. Suit No. 1012 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition in Property Dispute — Second Appeal Under Section 41 of Punjab Courts Act, 1918 Does Not Require Substantial Question of Law. The Court restored the High Court's judgment after finding that the original judgment erroneously applied Section 100 CPC instead of Section 41 of the Punjab Act.

16 May 2024

The petitioner filed a review petition seeking review of an order dated 13.03.2019 in Civil Appeal No. 6567 of 2014, wherein the Supreme Court had all...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Eviction Orders Under BPMC Act — Delegation of Quasi-Judicial Powers Under Section 69 Not Permissible for Section 81B Evictions. The Court held that eviction orders under Section 81B of the BPMC Act require specific delegation and cannot be delegated under the general power of Section 69, but found the orders valid as the officer was duly delegated.

2 Nov 2012

The petitioners were evicted from municipal premises under Chapter VIII-A of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation's Act, 1949 (BPMC Act). The e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Employer’s Petition under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award Directing Allotment of ESOP Shares to Ex-Employee. Questions Arise on Whether Absence of Formal ESOP Scheme Under Companies Act, 2013 Invalidates Contractual Vesting of Options and Whether Specific Performance Was Appropriate Remedy.

5 Aug 2026

The petitioner, Waterfield Advisors Private Limited, a management consultancy firm, filed this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Termination. Court Holds That Termination of Development Agreement by Cooperative Housing Society Was Valid and Appellant Failed to Make Out a Prima Facie Case for Interim Protection Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Aug 2016

The appellant, M/s. Amisha Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Departmental Action in Jail Break Case. Case Involves Escape of Four Under-Trials from Burail Jail Through a 94-Foot Tunnel, Leading to FIR and Enquiry Committee Report.

1 Jan 1970

The case concerns the escape of four under-trial prisoners from Model Jail, Burail, Chandigarh, on the night of 21-22 January 2004. The prisoners esca...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Applications in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 8 Rule 1 CPC. Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days Leads to Striking Off Defence, But Court Finds No Justification for Ex-Parte Decree Without Considering Application for Setting Aside Abatement.

5 Jun 2023

The case involves two civil revision applications filed by the applicants (original defendants) against the respondents (original plaintiffs) challeng...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenue — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution of India and Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The court held that the detaining authority must ensure the detenue understands the grounds of detention to make an effective representation; failure to do so renders the detention illegal.

31 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Shrenika, wife of the detenue Sri. Huchappa @ Dhanaraj Kalebag, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Second Appeals in Part, Remands Suits for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Limitation and Entitlement to Interest in Recovery Suits by Small Scale Industrial Unit against State Corporation. The court held that the lower appellate court failed to properly consider the applicable articles of the Limitation Act and the entitlement to interest under the Interest Act.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Dattatray s/o Shankarrao Borgaonkar, proprietor of Shree Industries, a small scale industrial unit, filed three suits (Special Civil Su...

59 60 61 62 63

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)