Search Results for "director guarantee"

1138 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1138 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings for Offences Under MMRD Act and IPC; Non-Cognizable Offences Cannot Be Investigated Without Written Complaint by Authorized Officer.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, adjudicated a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes MMDR Act Proceedings Initiated by Police in Multiple Petitions; Police Not Authorized Under Section 22 of MMDR Act. Cognizance of Offences Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Cannot Be Taken on Police Report—Only Authorized Persons Can File Complaint.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Petitions to Quash Criminal Proceedings under MMRD Act and IPC. Common Legal Question Addressed Regarding Maintainability of Prosecution under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard a batch of petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking the qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit by Consignee for Non-Delivery of Goods; Dubai Court Order Frustrated Contract of Affreightment. Non-delivery was due to a Dubai Court order attaching the cargo, which frustrated the contract of affreightment, absolving the defendants of liability.

The case involved an admiralty suit filed by Bhatinda Chemicals Ltd., the consignee, against the vessel m.v. 'X-PRESS NUPTSE' and its owners, Fintas S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court at Bombay Considers Challenge to Revised Guidelines for Grant of Offshore Exploration Licence. Petitioner Argues Notification Violates Section 35 of Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002 and Article 14.

The writ petition was filed by Rare(H) Minerals Private Limited, a company engaged in prospecting and exploration, challenging the Notification (Revis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Company Petition for Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement and Reduction of Share Capital. Petition Seeks to Restructure Debts and Reduce Capital Under Sections 391, 392, and 102 of the Companies Act, 1956.

This matter pertains to a company petition filed by Sharp Industries Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reserves Verdict on Stay of Film ‘Black Friday’ Amid Pending Trial in 1993 Blasts Case. Accused Argues Docudrama Constitutes Contempt and Defamation, Violates Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21.

The writ petition was filed by Mushtaq Moosa Tarani, accused No. 44 in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts trial (Bombay Blast Case No. 1 of 1993), under the ...