High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Petitions to Quash Criminal Proceedings under MMRD Act and IPC. Common Legal Question Addressed Regarding Maintainability of Prosecution under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard a batch of petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking the quashing of criminal proceedings pending before various lower courts. The cases involved offences registered under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Sections 379 and 511) and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (Sections 4(1), 4(1A), 21, 22) along with the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 (Rules 3, 32, 42, 44(1), 44(2)). The court noted that although the cases arose from different police stations and were pending before different courts, they involved a common question of law. With the consent of the petitioners' counsel and the learned High Court Government Pleader, the matters were taken up together for final disposal. The petitioners sought to quash the proceedings on the ground that the charges under the MMRD Act and Rules were combined with IPC offences. The court began enumerating the case details in a tabular form but the available text of the judgment ends abruptly before the court recorded its decision or reasoning. Therefore, the final outcome and legal principles remain unknown.

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings involving offences under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994, along with Indian Penal Code, could be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (02) 52

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101274/2018 C/W. CRIMINAL PETITION NOS.101815/2018, 101986/2018, 102023/2018, 102059/2018, 102060/2018, 102061/2018, 102062/2018, 102107/2018, 102122/2018, 102126/2018 & 102281/2018

2019-02-06

H.P. Sandesh

Sumangala A Chakalabbi, Prashant F Goudar, Harshawardhan M Patil, Jagadish Patil, K. Anand Kumar, Praveen K Uppar

Ravi @ Ravindra Shetty, Atyanarayana, Saddam, Rasool, Balesh, Satteppa, Shivappa Irappa Kudarimani, Shivaji Laxman Dhable, Anil Manohar Patil, Sunil Ashok Kumbar, Ratan Narayan Patil, Yallappa Bharamappa Gurav, Lagamanna @ Lagamappa, Satteppa Yallappa Basaragi, Basappa Irappa Nirvani, Kempanna Appanna Mallaholi

State of Karnataka (through various police stations including Gangavathi Rural, Yamakanamardi, Katkol, Belagavi Rural, Kudachi), Narayan Swami (Police Inspector), J.B. Pujeri (ASI), B.S. Talawar (PSI), S.N. Naik (PSI), K.B. Kanti (SHO), and other police officials

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash proceedings pending before various Magistrate courts.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the entire criminal proceedings in multiple cases involving offences under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994, and the Indian Penal Code.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed that the registration of cases under both special statutes and the IPC was impermissible or that the proceedings were otherwise not maintainable.

Issues

Whether criminal proceedings involving offences under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994, along with Indian Penal Code, could be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Judgment Excerpts

Though, all these cases arise out of different crime numbers of different police stations and pending before different Court, since issue involved in the cases is only question of law and the same is common in all these cases, they are taken up together for disposal by this common order. The prayer sought in the petitions by invoking Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is to quash the entire proceedings pending before the different Courts since the respective cases are registered for both the offences under the MMRD Act and Rules and Under IPC.

Procedural History

Multiple criminal cases were registered at various police stations across Karnataka for offences under IPC and MMRD Act/KMMC Rules. The accused persons filed petitions under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seeking quashing of the proceedings. The High Court clubbed the petitions as they involved a common question of law and heard them together for final disposal. The matter was reserved for orders on 09-01-2019 and pronounced on 06-02-2019, but the available text of the judgment does not include the actual decision or reasoning.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 379, 511
  • Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957: 4(1), 4(1A), 21, 22
  • Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994: 3, 32, 42, 44(1), 44(2)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Declaration for Power Station Due to Delay Beyond One Year. Section 6 Declaration Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Quashed as Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period from Section 4 Notifi...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Petitions to Quash Criminal Proceedings under MMRD Act and IPC. Common Legal Question Addressed Regarding Maintainability of Prosecution under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and K...