KAHC010026042017_1
9 Mar 2018...
Search Results for "company secretary"
3387 result(s) found
Found 3387 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka hears civil miscellaneous petition seeking termination of existing arbitral tribunal and appointment of independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arises from a works contract where the contractor sought replacement of the arbitrator appointed by the department on grounds of bias and non-compliance with disclosure requirements.
11 Aug 2022The petitioner, a contractor, was awarded a works contract by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for construction of a Sewage Treatment Plant....
- 31
High Court
Karnataka High Court Grants Interim Stay on Notification Cancelling Nomination of Chairman of Karnataka State Minorities Commission; Examination of Pleasure Doctrine and Natural Justice Under Sections 4 and 5 of the Act
28 May 2024The petitioner, Abdul Azeem, a former Chairman of the Karnataka State Minorities Commission, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court und...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Smart Classrooms — Violation of Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation. Government Order dated 5.7.2016 quashed as it was passed without hearing the successful bidder and without valid reasons.
11 Sep 2019The petitioner, M/s Siddharth Infotech Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Governme...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Developers and MCGM from Recognizing TDR Transfer Agreements in Alleged Fraud by Society Members. Co-operative Housing Society Obtains Interim Relief Against Sale of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Under DRC Dated 7 August 2023 Amidst Allegations of Forgery and Unauthorized Payments.
3 Oct 2025The dispute arose from the acquisition of a portion of the plaintiff co-operative housing society's land by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...
- 14
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Housebreaking and Theft Case — Petitioner Granted Pre-arrest Bail. Court held that custodial interrogation was not necessary as the petitioner had cooperated with investigation and the alleged offence under Sections 457 and 380 IPC did not involve violence or recovery of stolen property.
4 Oct 2024The petitioner, Shri Vishal Ramesh Khatwani, filed a revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973...
- 203
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Dispute Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Government's Satisfaction for Reference Not Open to Judicial Review on Merits.
17 Feb 2023The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. and Shangrila Food Products Ltd. challenging the order of reference ma...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mining Lease Recommendation Under Section 11(3) of Mines and Minerals Act. The Court upheld the Minister's recommendation for grant of mining lease to respondent no.3, finding no violation of natural justice or procedural irregularity.
19 Dec 2011The petitioner, M/s Veet Rag Homes Private Limited, challenged the order dated 25.4.2008 of the Minister (Industries & Mining) recommending grant of m...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Implement Award and Settlement Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.
10 Oct 2012The petitioner, Tata Yazaki Autocomp Ltd., a company manufacturing wire harness for the automobile sector employing around 500 permanent workmen in Pu...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.
20 Jul 2016The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...
- 34
