Search Results for "bail jurisdiction"

2937 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2937 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Money Dispute Case Under Sections 354, 323, 504, 506 IPC. Court Held That Custodial Interrogation Not Required as Dispute Primarily Civil, and Granted Bail Under Section 438 CrPC.

The petitioners, B.M. Mallaiah and Smt. Bhagyamma, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Section 364A IPC. Court finds no demand for ransom or threat to kill, essential for Section 364A IPC, and grants bail under Section 439 CrPC.

The petitioner, Manjunatha @ Manju, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Crime N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Anticipatory Bail in Building Collapse; Alleged Negligent Chipping of Columns Not Causa Causans According to Applicant. Licensee Seeks Pre-Arrest Bail, Contending No Gross Negligence and Exoneration by Municipal Committee Reports.

The matter involved an anticipatory bail application filed by Sundeep Bafna before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant had taken the underground a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Condition of Security for Vacating Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit - Cargo Owner Not Liable for Demurrage and Port Charges as They Are Not Party to Contract of Carriage

The appellant, Best Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against an order dated 4th February 2010 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in Customs Act Detention Case — Detention Held Not Illegal. Petitioner's arrest under Section 104 of Customs Act, 1962 and subsequent judicial custody were lawful; no violation of Articles 14, 21, 22 of Constitution found.

The petitioner, Ankit Ghanshyam Mutha, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus and direction for his release from custody of the Directo...