Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case — Petitioner Granted Bail on Conditions Due to No Prima Facie Case for Custodial Interrogation. Court Held That Custodial Interrogation May Not Be Necessary and Granted Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for Offences Under Sections 143, 144, 146, 148, 504, 323, 307 Read With 149 IPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 172
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Bhaskar, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.125/2019 registered by Rajajinagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 146, 148, 504, 323, 307 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The case was pending before the LXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City. Previously, the petitioner had filed an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. before the Sessions Court in Crl.Misc.11331/2019, which was dismissed on 23-12-2019. The petitioner then approached the High Court. The court, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State, considered the facts and circumstances. The court observed that custodial interrogation may not be necessary and that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. The court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions including executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety, appearing before the Investigating Officer as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without prior permission. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 Cr.P.C. - Prima Facie Case - Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 143, 144, 146, 148, 504, 323, 307 read with 149 IPC - Court held that custodial interrogation may not be necessary and granted bail with conditions - Held that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail subject to conditions (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.125/2019 for offences under Sections 143, 144, 146, 148, 504, 323, 307 read with 149 of IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions: executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety, appearing before the Investigating Officer as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
  • Prima facie case
  • Custodial interrogation
  • Conditions for bail
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 222

Criminal Petition No.3014/2020

2020-07-07

N.K. Sudhindrarao

Sri Manjunatha S (for petitioner), Sri Vinayaka V S (HCGP for respondent)

Bhaskar

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought enlargement on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.125/2019.

Filing Reason

Petitioner apprehended arrest in connection with offences under Sections 143, 144, 146, 148, 504, 323, 307 read with 149 IPC.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner's earlier application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. before the Sessions Court (Crl.Misc.11331/2019) was dismissed on 23-12-2019.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that custodial interrogation may not be necessary. Respondent-State opposed the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi

Custodial interrogation may not be necessary in this case, and the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

This matter is taken up through Video Conference today. The petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.125/2019... Previously, the petitioner had made application before the learned LXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., in Crl.Misc.11331/2019 and that came to be dismissed on 23-12-2019.

Procedural History

The petitioner initially filed an anticipatory bail application (Crl.Misc.11331/2019) before the LXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, which was dismissed on 23-12-2019. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the present petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 438
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 143, 144, 146, 148, 504, 323, 307, 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Murder Charge in Dowry Death Case — Sessions Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Adding Section 302 IPC Without Committal. The court held that under Section 193 CrPC, a Sessions Court cannot take cognizance of an off...