Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1044 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1044 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Developer Selection in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme - Tenants of Municipal Corporation Held Ineligible to Vote. The court upheld the selection of developer by General Body Meeting, finding no procedural irregularity in service of notice or conduct of meeting.

The petitioners, claiming to be eligible slum dwellers, challenged the appointment of Respondent No.7 as developer for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging Acquisition Under MHADA Act; Trustees Contest Procedural Validity of Acquisition Notice and Notification.

The appellants, trustees of a public trust, owned buildings known as Badak Chawls in Mazgaon, Mumbai. The Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Autho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Slum Dweller for Profiteering from Slum Rehabilitation Tenement. Illegal Transfer and Commercial Use of Residential Premises Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 Upheld Eviction.

The petitioner, Rajendra R. Vishwakarma, was a slum dweller who received tenement no. 104 in 'A' wing of New Prabhat Cooperative Housing Society Ltd, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award by MHADA — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Bidder's Challenge to Summary Rejection of Technical Bid Fails as Evaluation Was Based on Tender Conditions and No Prejudice Was Caused.

The petitioners, ACC India Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Parking Space Regulations Under UDCPR in Navi Mumbai. Court holds that UDCPR provisions are statutory and binding, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Sandeep Thakur, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the parking space regulations under the ...