Search Results for "Joint Registrar order"

1903 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1903 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GCZMA Demolition Order for Lack of Quorum and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's 18 rooms saved as sub-committee meeting with only 4 members violated requirement of 5 members for cases directed by High Court.

The petitioner, Shri Sylvestre D'Souza, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15/02...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court examines writ petition challenging District Deputy Registrar's deemed conveyance order under Section 11 of MOFA. Petition alleges order was ex parte and granted excess lands CTS Nos.1314 and 1287 based on fabricated certificates, prompting request to revoke redevelopment permission.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by a cooperative hous...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Lack of Integrity and Efficiency. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to prematurely retire a District Judge based on adverse entries and overall performance record.

The petitioner, Ashokkumar Hiralal Lohiya, was a judicial officer who joined the judiciary as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in 1978 and was promoted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Legislative Council Board Order Granting Retrospective Seniority. The Court Examines Whether the Board's Order Violates Principles of Delay and Laches by Disturbing Seniority After 16 Years.

The case arose from a seniority dispute among Section Officers in the Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat. The petitioners, Meghana Dilip Talekar, Shi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Reassessment Notice Invalid Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure. Arbitration Award Receipt Held as Capital Receipt, Not Income Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Ramona Pinto, an individual, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 2nd April 2018 pass...