Search Results for "Extraneous material"

1077 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1077 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Premature Retirement Order Against Employee in National Textile Corporation — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind. Order Set Aside as Corporation Failed to Consider Employee's Representation and Did Not Follow Its Own Premature Retirement Scheme.

The petitioner, Vasant Lalchand Shah, joined the National Textile Corporation (NTC) in December 1978 as a Weaving Master. He had prior experience of o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Registrar's Cancellation of Trade Union Registration for Non-Compliance with Section 28-A of Trade Unions Act, 1926. Failure to maintain proper membership register and file annual returns justified cancellation despite opportunity of hearing.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Mumbai Taximen's Union and its Secretary challenging the order of the Deputy Registrar of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Cancellation of Bail in POCSO Case — No Supervening Circumstances or Misconduct Established. Court held that cancellation of bail requires proof of misuse of liberty or supervening circumstances, not mere disagreement with the bail order.

The applicant, a minor victim through her natural guardian, filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of investment agreement, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 15th June 2017. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds That the Arbitrator's Finding on Limitation Was Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...