High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of Professor for Sexual Harassment Due to Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the Syndicate's resolution to terminate the petitioner without providing a copy of the inquiry report and without affording an opportunity of hearing was illegal and arbitrary.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 91
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. K.M. Hosamani, a Professor of Organic Chemistry at Karnatak University, Dharwad, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the resolution No.36 dated 11.01.2013 passed by the Syndicate of the respondent-University and the consequential office order dated 12.01.2013 terminating his services. The petitioner was issued Articles of Charges on 12.03.2011 alleging sexual harassment of a research student, Ms. Ramya V. Shinglapur, including demands for money, non-approval of her thesis, and misappropriation of funds. An inquiry was conducted, and the inquiry officer submitted a report. However, the Syndicate, without furnishing a copy of the inquiry report to the petitioner and without affording him an opportunity of hearing, passed the resolution terminating his services. The petitioner contended that this violated principles of natural justice. The court, after hearing arguments from both sides, held that the failure to supply the inquiry report and provide a hearing before imposing the major penalty of termination rendered the proceedings illegal and arbitrary. The court quashed the resolution and the order, allowing the writ petition.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination - Natural Justice - Inquiry Report - The petitioner, a Professor, was terminated based on an inquiry report without furnishing a copy of the report or providing an opportunity of hearing. The court held that the failure to supply the inquiry report and hear the petitioner before imposing the penalty of termination vitiates the entire disciplinary proceedings. (Paras 4-6)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 - The High Court can quash an order passed in violation of principles of natural justice. The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned resolution and order. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the resolution of the Syndicate dated 11.01.2013 and the consequential order dated 12.01.2013 terminating the petitioner from service are illegal and arbitrary for want of compliance with principles of natural justice?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the resolution No.36 dated 11.01.2013 and the order dated 12.01.2013.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Inquiry report must be furnished before punishment
  • Termination without opportunity is illegal
  • Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (08) 21

Writ Petition No.75667/2013 (S-RES)

2013-08-07

Aravind Kumar

Sri. Subramanya Jois, Senior Counsel for Sri. V.G. Bhat (for petitioner), Sri. Mallikarjun S. Hiremath (for respondent)

Dr. K.M. Hosamani

The Karnatak University, represented by its Registrar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging termination of service.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of resolution No.36 dated 11.01.2013 and order dated 12.01.2013 terminating the petitioner's service.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was terminated without being furnished a copy of the inquiry report and without opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the termination order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice? Whether the Syndicate's resolution is illegal and arbitrary?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the inquiry report was not furnished and no opportunity of hearing was given before termination. Respondent argued in support of the termination.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of service without furnishing the inquiry report and without affording an opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice and is illegal and arbitrary.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner who is a Professor of Organic Chemistry in the Department of Studies in Chemistry of respondent-University is seeking for quashing of the order dated 12.01.2013 Annexure-B and quashing of the resolution No.36 dated 11.01.2013 Annexure-AB passed by the Syndicate of the respondent-University on the ground it is illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable in law.

Procedural History

The petitioner was issued Articles of Charges on 12.03.2011. An inquiry was conducted. The Syndicate passed resolution No.36 on 11.01.2013 and issued order on 12.01.2013 terminating the petitioner. The petitioner filed the writ petition on an unspecified date, which was taken up for final disposal by consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by High Court in SFIO Case Involving Massive Corporate Fraud. Twin Conditions Under Section 212(6)(ii) of Companies Act, 2013 Must Be Satisfied Before Granting Bail for Offences Under Section 447.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Detention Order for Violation of Interim Injunction in Partition Suit — Willful Disobedience of Court Order Attracts Civil Prison Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC.