Search Results for "Collector permission"

1789 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1789 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act — Petitioners Guilty of Suppression of Facts. Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Rejected as Petitioners Had Received Compensation and Suppressed Earlier Proceedings.

The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the acquisition of their lands b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Absence of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent factual findings by lower courts upheld as appellants failed to establish any legal error in dismissal of suit for injunction and adverse possession claim under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The dispute originated from a Regular Civil Suit filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction against the State of Gujarat and its officers to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Suit Challenging Cancellation of Lease by Nagpur Improvement Trust — Dharmashala Allotment Dispute under Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936

The appeal arose from the rejection of a temporary injunction application by the trial court in a suit filed by a charitable trust against the Nagpur ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Unauthorized Statue from Public Road in Front of Temple. Court Directs Authorities to Remove Encroachment and File Compliance Report Within Four Weeks, Reiterating Prohibition on Installing Statues in Public Places Without Permission.

The petitioner, M. Gopal, filed a writ of mandamus seeking direction to respondents 1 to 3 (District Collector, Commissioner of Chennai Corporation, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Challenge to Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Prove Lapse Under Section 24(2) of LARR Act, 2013. Compensation Tendered and Possession Taken by MIDC, Acquisition Did Not Lapse.

The petitioners, Ramesh Bapurao Nikhade and Dilipkumar Bapurao Nikhade, along with the legal representatives of Bapurao Dasruji Nikhade, filed writ pe...