Search Results for "valuation date"

1736 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1736 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation to Rs. 300 per sq m for Acquired Land. Court Relies on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential Value of Land Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The judgment pertains to two first appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 20.12.2014 passed by the learned District Judge-1, North Goa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal, Upholds Applicability of Section 50C to Transfer of Leasehold Rights. Leasehold Rights Constitute Capital Asset and Assignment Thereof Attracts Section 50C Deeming Provision.

The appeal arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur dated 24.03.2017 dismissing the assessee's claim that Section 50C of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes E-Auction Notice and Sale Certificate in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Violation of Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Failure to Serve 30-Day Notice Before Auction Renders Sale Void.

The petitioners, Sri T.S. Nataraj, Sri Harsha N., and Smt. N. Seema, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Gutkha Excise Duty Case for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the CESTAT's findings on valuation and penalty were factual and not perverse, and no question of law arose under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves appeals filed by M/s. Trishul Arecanut Granuels Private Limited and its Director, H.S. Nataraj, against the Commissioner of Central ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Premium Paid Under ULC Act Government Resolution — Petitioner Cannot Claim Refund After Voluntarily Availing Benefit and Selling Land to Third Parties.

The petitioner, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd., was a beneficiary of an exemption order dated 29 February 1980 under Section 20(1) of the Urban La...