Search Results for "special limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "special limitation"

3546 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3546 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suo Motu Revision Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Initiated After 48 Years — Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Notice Vitiate Proceedings. The court held that the power of suo motu revision must be exercised within a reasonable period, and a delay of 48 years is unreasonable; further, the order passed without notice to the grantee violates natural justice and is void.

9 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Ramakrishna M, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Condonation of Delay in Restoration of Suit — Limitation Period for Filing Restoration Application Not Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court upheld the trial court's order condoning a 10-year delay in filing restoration application, holding that Article 137 does not apply to restoration applications and the court has inherent power under Section 151 CPC.

14 Dec 2022

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants (original defendants) challenging the judgment and order dated 04.05.2022 passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Land Acquisition Reference on Limitation Grounds. Notice Under Section 12(2) Served on 27.10.2003, Reference Filed on 9.12.2003 Held Within Time Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

14 Oct 2010

The petitioners, nine individuals whose lands were acquired for the construction of the Urdhav Pravara right canal, challenged the order of the Specia...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Applications by State in Land Acquisition Appeals Due to Unexplained Delay of 2014 Days. Delay of 2014 days in filing first appeal against land acquisition award not sufficiently explained, as state failed to provide cogent reasons for each day of delay.

19 Jan 2026

The judgment pertains to a batch of civil applications filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Unit 1 and another (the State) under Section 5 o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Pharmaceutical Company and Directors in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Sample Not Drawn in Accordance with Rules. Failure to Follow Sampling Procedure Under Rule 46 of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

22 Sep 2022

The petitioners, M/s Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd (a drug manufacturing company) and its Managing Director and Director, filed a petition under Section ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application in FERA/FEMA Appeal — Limitation Period Governed by FERA Section 54, Not FEMA Section 49(5)(c). The court held that the appeal against the Appellate Tribunal's order under FEMA is governed by the limitation period under Section 54 of FERA, which is 60 days, and the High Court cannot condone delay beyond that period.

4 May 2011

The Union of India, through the Directorate of Enforcement, filed a Civil Application seeking condonation of 291 days delay in filing an appeal agains...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...

High Court

High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Income-tax Act as Time-Barred -- Reassessment for Assessment Year 2015-16 Held Invalid Due to Limitation Under Sections 148, 149, 153A, and 153C

5 Jan 2026

The High Court of Gujarat allowed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Unexplained Delay of 2608 Days Not Condonable. The Court held that administrative delays by the State do not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

16 Jan 2026

The State of Gujarat and its officers filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of 2608 days delay in fili...

58 59 60 61 62

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)