Search Results for "private company become public"

1859 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1859 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Stays Tender Process for DPD Transport Solution — Transporters' Association and Importer Challenge Monopolistic Selection. Interim Order Prevents JNPT from Proceeding with Tender for Selection of Five Transporters, Protecting Existing Rights Pending Final Hearing.

The dispute arose from a tender notice dated 23 March 2017 issued by the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (Respondent No. 2) for selection of transporters ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka adjourns writ petition filed by employees of Bharat Electronics Limited for preliminary hearing; no final order passed. Petition seeks mandamus and certiorari based on allegations of discrimination and violation of service rules.

The writ petition was filed by 52 employees of Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), a Government of India enterprise under the Ministry of Defence. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Orders in SARFAESI Proceeding. Borrowers Failed to Comply with Conditional Orders and Sale Certificate Was Already Issued to Auction Purchaser.

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders of the Debts Recovery Tribuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge Against Arbitral Order Granting Opportunity to Cure Resolution Irregularity. Order held not an interim award under Section 2(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as it does not finally determine any issue.

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Petitioners (RA Group) challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Property by EDC Limited. Held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or arbitrariness in the auction process and that the sale was validly conducted under the terms of the loan agreement.

The petitioner, Asiatic Holiday Resorts Pvt. Ltd., had taken a loan from respondent no. 2, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation, and had mortgaged ...