Search Results for "ownership evidence"

3167 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3167 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Dispute Over Well Ownership and Construction Obstruction. Lower Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC by Remanding Without Finding on Preliminary Point.

The appellant-defendant appealed against the judgment and order dated 27 November 2020 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Amravati, in Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court dismissing their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Declaration, Injunction, and Redemption of Mortgage. Court holds that second appeal under Section 100 CPC cannot be entertained on concurrent findings of fact unless substantial question of law arises.

The judgment pertains to two second appeals arising from the same parties and property. Second Appeal No.477 of 2017 was filed by the original plainti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

This is a second appeal arising from a civil suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction. The appellant, Parubai Savliram Kshatriya (si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision Petitions in Rent Control Case — Bona Fide Requirement for Demolition Not Established. Concurrent findings of fact by courts below upheld as not perverse under Section 115 CPC.

The petitioner, Smt. M. Sharada, filed two revision petitions under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging a common order dated...