Search Results for "land water dispute"

1583 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1583 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Execution Against Bhumidhari Rights and Trees Under U.P. Encumbered Estates Act. Bhumidhari Rights Held Not to be Proprietary Rights, and Trees Not Vesting in State are Debtor's Property Liable to Execution.

The dispute arose from execution proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh Encumbered Estates Act, 1934. The predecessors-in-interest of the appellants were...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Encroachment and Rainwater Drainage. Court finds that the first appellate court failed to consider the map attached to the sale deed and the trial court's findings on encroachment, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

The appellant, Meenadevi Vatnani, filed a Second Appeal against the judgment of the Principal District Judge, Amravati, dated 5.3.2014, which reversed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Flyover Construction on Environmental Grounds — Held That Project Did Not Require Environmental Clearance as It Was a Linear Project on Existing Highway.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a flyover and road widening project on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...