Search Results for "concurrent prosecution"

743 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 743 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Maintainability Objections Against State’s Criminal Revision Application in Double Jeopardy Case. Second Revision by State Against Discharge of Accused on Double Jeopardy Ground Held Not Barred by Section 397(3) CrPC.

The petitioner, State through Police Inspector, CID Crime Branch, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court at Goa against an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

FERA APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2006

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Councillor's Election for Bribery Under Representation of the People Act. Payment of Rs.500 to a voter constitutes corrupt practice of bribery under Section 123(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the election of the returned candidate is void.

The case arises from an election petition filed by Respondent No.1 (original petitioner) challenging the election of the petitioner (original responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Unnatural Sex and Extortion Case — Mentally Ill Victim's Testimony Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Parents' Testimony Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 377 and 387 IPC.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Ramcharan Ramavadh Yadav against his conviction under Sections 377 and 387 read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Family Dispute Case. Accused convicted under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 of IPC for stabbing mother-in-law, wife, and sister-in-law after demand for wife's return to marital home.

The appellant, Isak Abdul Haq Patel, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Sessions Case No. 223 of 1992 for the murder of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Heirs' Challenge to Gold Seizure and Penalty Under Gold (Control) Act, 1968 — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Possession of Primary Gold Without Permit. Burden of Proof on Possessor Not Discharged; Penalty of Rs. 5,000 Upheld as Within Statutory Limits.

The petitioners, heirs of late Ramratan Shrivallabh Chandak, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28th February 1986 passed by the Customs...