Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

6559 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6559 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Externment Challenge in Bombay Police Act Case — Externment from Two Districts Reduced to One Due to Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Petitioner's Prejudicial Activities Confined to Jalna, Yet Externed from Aurangabad Also, Violates Section 56 of Bombay Police Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Ravindra @ Ravi S/o Harisingh Jadhav, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Debt or Liability. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails as complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt.

The applicants, Ravindra s/o Bhimrao Khillare, Seema w/o Ravindra Khillare, Deepak s/o Bhimrao Khillare, and Kalpana w/o Deepak Khillare, filed a crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Executing Court's Rejection of Time-Barred Application to Set Aside Auction Sale Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC. Application Filed 63 Days After Sale Found Barred by Limitation, Secured Creditor's Prior Charge on Property Upheld for Distribution of Sale Proceeds.

The petitioner, a borrower, had availed a housing loan from respondent No.1 finance company and mortgaged the purchased flat. Upon default, the lender...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Addresses Court Fees in Motor Vehicle Accident Appeals Under Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Claimants Who Are Neither Insurer nor Owner Contend They May Restrict Appeal Valuation and Pay Only Half Ad Valorem Court Fees; Taxing Officer Demands Full Fee on Enhanced Claim Difference.

The dispute arose from office objections requiring deficit court fees from appellants who filed appeals against awards of Motor Accident Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Venue Change in Arbitration Dispute — Clause 19.3(b) of Agreement Held to Specify Seat, Not Venue, Under Section 20 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Dhule Municipal Commissioner, challenged an interim order dated 16/06/2024 passed by the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Proceeding No....