KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "tax arrear"
110 result(s) found
Found 110 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A NI Act for Pre-Amendment Offences. Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is Prospective and Cannot Apply to Complaints Filed Before Its Insertion on 1 September 2018.
1 Jul 2019The case arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed in 2016 against the appellant G.J. Raja by the respon...
- 356
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Kerosene Dealers' Association Challenging Inclusion of VAT in Ceiling Price. State's Power to Fix Maximum Price Including Taxes Upheld Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
10 Sep 2015The petitioners, Mumbai Kerosene Dealers' Association and its members, who are wholesale kerosene dealers holding licences under the Maharashtra Keros...
- 100
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows SFC's Claim for Priority Over Central Excise Dues in Recovery from Borrower's Assets. State Financial Corporation's Statutory Charge Under Section 29 of SFC Act, 1951 Prevails Over Crown Debt Under Central Excise Act, 1944.
18 Jul 2006The petitioner, SICOM Ltd., a State Financial Corporation established under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, advanced a term loan of Rs. 51...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.
1 Feb 2023The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar under Bombay Moneylenders Act to Nullify Registered Sale Deeds. Multiple writ petitions challenge orders directing reconveyance of agricultural land alleged to be security for unlicensed money lending.
13 Oct 2006The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of 21 writ petitions collectively, all challenging orders passed by the Taluka Assistant Registr...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 68
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Deduction from Gratuity for Cooperative Loan Repayment. Employer Cannot Deduct Gratuity for Loan to Cooperative Society Unless It Is a Government Due Under Rule 132 read with Rule 134 of Maharashtra Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1982.
23 Dec 2013The appellant, Ashfaq Husain, was a Section Officer with Zilla Parishad, Washim. Upon his retirement, the respondents (Chief Executive Officer, Block ...
- 151
