Search Results for "selection seniority"

664 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 664 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Ex-Servicemen's Appeal in Seniority Fixation Case Under Punjab Civil Service Rules. Appellants Not Entitled to Military Service Benefits Under Repealed 1972 Rules as Appointment Made Under 1982 Rules After Advertisement Issued Post-Enforcement.

The dispute involved ex-servicemen appellants who were appointed to the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) in 1986 after being released from the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Employee Seniority and Promotion. The Court upheld the High Court's direction to consider the employee's seniority from his promotion date in the original authority, finding the State's revisions arbitrary under service rules.

The dispute arose from the seniority and promotion claims of the first respondent, who was appointed as Sub-Engineer in Special Area Development Autho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Seniority and Promotion Rights in Service Regularization Dispute - Continuity of Service Entitles Counting of Retrenched Period for Promotion Without Monetary Benefits Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The dispute originated from the appointments of the respondents as Assistant Managers on contract in 2000, which were regularized in 2006 under the Ke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre. Education Officer's Order Declaring Respondent No.4 as Senior and Entitled to Head Master Post Upheld Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Ed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Non-Selection for Group B Post in Railways. Selection process under seniority-cum-selection quota upheld as valid and non-arbitrary.

The petitioner, Sri A.R. Dubla Naik, a Senior Section Officer (Group C) at Bangalore Cantonment Railway Station, challenged his non-selection to the G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of LDCs Against Integrated Seniority List. Memo dated 02.04.1994 Issued Under Section 79 of Electricity Supply Act, 1948 Valid for Preparing Integrated Seniority List of LDCs and Typists.

The case involves a dispute over the integrated seniority list of Lower Division Clerks (LDCs) and Typists in the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Boa...