Search Results for "representative character"

852 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 852 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Restores Suit Dismissed as Withdrawn Without Consent of All Plaintiffs in Representative Suit Under Order I Rule 8 CPC. Suit filed under Order I Rule 8 CPC cannot be withdrawn by some plaintiffs without consent of all and without court permission.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs No.5, 7, and 9, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1501 OF 2016

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Induction of Non-Legislator Ministers with Less Than Six Months Remaining in Assembly Term. Conformity of Such Induction with Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India Questioned.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar (a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Chief Officer in Idol Dumping Case — No Intent to Insult Religion Found. Section 295 IPC requires deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings, which was absent as the applicant acted in discharge of official duties.

The applicant, Dhondiba Irba Namwad, was the Chief Officer of Municipal Council, Khamgaon, District Buldhana. He filed a criminal application under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Donees to Lead Oral Evidence Contradicting Deed of Gift in Insolvency Proceedings Under Section 55 of Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909. Section 92 of Evidence Act Held Inapplicable as Official Assignee Is Not a Representative in Interest of the Insolvent.

This appeal arose from proceedings initiated by the Official Assignee of Bombay under Section 55 of the Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909, to decl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Gurdwara Management Under Entry 32 of List II. Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 Found Constitutionally Valid as It Pertains to Management of Religious Institutions Within State Legislative Competence.

The dispute arose from the enactment of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 by the State of Haryana, which created a separate juristic en...