Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Chief Officer in Idol Dumping Case — No Intent to Insult Religion Found. Section 295 IPC requires deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings, which was absent as the applicant acted in discharge of official duties.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Dhondiba Irba Namwad, was the Chief Officer of Municipal Council, Khamgaon, District Buldhana. He filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.80/2015 registered at Police Station Khamgaon for an offence under Section 295 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The FIR was lodged by respondent no.2, Omprakash Narayan Sharma, alleging that after the Ganesh festival, idols of Lord Ganesh that had been immersed in artificial tanks provided by the Municipal Council were found dumped at a garbage site, with some idols attempted to be pushed under the ground by vehicles. The complainant alleged that this was done with the intention of insulting Hindu religion and inciting communal violence. The applicant contended that the allegations did not disclose any offence under Section 295 IPC as there was no deliberate or malicious intention to insult religion. The court examined the ingredients of Section 295 IPC, which requires an act done with deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings. The court noted that the applicant was acting in discharge of his official duties and there was no material to show any such intention. The court held that the FIR did not make out any offence and quashed the same, along with all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Section 295 IPC - Deliberate and Malicious Intention - The court examined whether the FIR disclosed an offence under Section 295 IPC, which requires an act done with deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings. The applicant, as Chief Officer, had acted in discharge of official duties regarding disposal of immersed idols. The court held that the allegations did not show any such intention, and the FIR was liable to be quashed. (Paras 1-30)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - The court reiterated that the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to prevent abuse of process of court or to secure ends of justice. Where the allegations in the FIR, even if taken at face value, do not constitute any offence, the proceedings can be quashed. (Paras 1-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the allegations in the FIR disclose the essential ingredients of an offence under Section 295 of the Indian Penal Code, particularly the element of deliberate and malicious intention to insult the religion or religious beliefs of any class.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the criminal application and quashed FIR No.80/2015 registered at Police Station Khamgaon for offence under Section 295 read with Section 34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings.

Law Points

  • Section 295 IPC requires deliberate and malicious intention to insult religion
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC when allegations do not disclose offence
  • Official acts done in good faith not constituting offence under Section 295 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (02) 144

Criminal Application (APL) No.192 of 2016

2020-02-27

Sunil B. Shukre, Madhav J. Jamdar

Mr. A.M. Ghare for applicant, Mr. T.A. Mirza (Asstt. Govt. Pleader) for respondent State

Dhondiba Irba Namwad

State of Maharashtra and Omprakash Narayan Sharma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.80/2015 registered under Section 295 r/w 34 IPC and consequential reliefs

Filing Reason

Allegations that the applicant, as Chief Officer, was involved in dumping of immersed idols of Lord Ganesh at a garbage site, allegedly with intention to insult Hindu religion

Issues

Whether the FIR discloses the essential ingredients of an offence under Section 295 IPC? Whether the FIR is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the allegations do not make out any offence under Section 295 IPC as there was no deliberate or malicious intention to insult religion; the act was done in discharge of official duties. Respondent State argued that the FIR discloses a prima facie case and the investigation should be allowed to proceed.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 295 IPC, the prosecution must establish that the act was done with deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings. Where the accused acted in discharge of official duties and there is no material to show such intention, the FIR does not disclose any offence and is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Criminal Application, the applicant, who was at the relevant time, Chief Officer of Municipal Council Khamgaon, District Buldhana has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 30.09.2015 registered against him and one more person vide Crime No.80/2015 for an offence punishable under Section 295 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The court held that the allegations do not disclose any deliberate or malicious intention to insult religion, and the applicant acted in discharge of official duties.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application (APL) No.192 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of FIR No.80/2015 registered on 30.09.2015 at Police Station Khamgaon for offence under Section 295 r/w 34 IPC. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 27.02.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 295, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court approved the amalgamation of 18 transferor companies with Pebble Bay Developers P...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Chief Officer in Idol Dumping Case — No Intent to Insult Religion Found. Section 295 IPC requires deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings, which was absent as the applicant acted in dis...