Search Results for "promotion criteria"

680 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 680 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Municipal Corporation's Promotion Process for Superintending Engineer Posts Due to Non-Compliance with Court Directions and Violation of Service Rules

The High Court allowed a writ petition filed by four Executive Engineers of Municipal Corporation challenging their exclusion from promotion to Superi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Whether Retrospective Absorption Order Requires Review of Earlier Promotional Exercises for Superintendents (Legal/Drafting). Legal Principle Examined: Whether Regular Service for Promotion Can Be Counted Retrospectively When Government Recognises Prior Cadre Status.

The writ petition was filed by two Legal Assistants working in the Law Department of the Government of Goa, who sought a review of the departmental pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Order Quashing Shortlisting Criteria for Civil Surgeon Selection. Held that prescribing higher qualification not advertised violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The case involves two writ petitions challenging a common judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 27 January 2014. The Tribunal had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Service Law Case — Notional Financial Benefits Upheld Despite No Actual Promotion. Rule 54(1)(a) of West Bengal Service Rules Precludes Retrospective Promotion but Notional Benefits Granted Due to Administrative Delay.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta which upheld an order of the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal directing tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Challenge to Promotion of Deputy Director of Health Services — Seniority and Eligibility Criteria Upheld. The court held that the promotion based on seniority-cum-merit was valid and the petitioner failed to establish any arbitrariness or violation of rules.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Dr. Prakash Nachinolkar and Dr. Ruando E.J. J. De Sa challenging the promotion of Dr. Sanjiv Dalvi a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to Recruitment Rules for Assistant Education Inspector, Class-III — Promotion by Special Competitive Examination Upheld. Seniority Not a Bar Where Rules Prescribe Merit-Based Selection Through Competitive Examination for Promotion.

The petitioners, six individuals selected as Head Teachers, Class-III by direct recruitment, filed a writ petition challenging the Recruitment Rules, ...