Search Results for "msedcl"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Labour Court's Decision on Employment Relationship Quashed; Case Remanded for Fresh Consideration. High Court quashes Labour Court's order due to misinterpretation of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the Contract Labour Act, 1970.

The writ petition challenges the Labour Court’s decision denying the petitioners' claim for reinstatement as security guards. The Labour Court's fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against MSEDCL Employees in Assault Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Employees Authorized to Detect Theft Under Electricity Act Are Public Servants Entitled to Protection.

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) working as Junior Engineer and Linemen, challenged t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petitions Against Ombudsman Orders for New Electricity Connections. Court holds that refusal to provide new connections based on previous dues of a different entity is arbitrary and violative of Section 43 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders of the Ele...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by MSEDCL Challenging Industrial Court Order Setting Aside Punishment for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-furnishing of enquiry report and lack of hearing before imposing punishment renders disciplinary action invalid under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) and its officers, challenged the judgment and order dated 26.4.2012 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petition Against Electricity Ombudsman Order Limiting Recovery of Arrears Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. Court upholds two-year limitation period for recovery of electricity charges, rejecting claim for arrears from 2003 to 2010.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated December 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Against MSEDCL Over Tariff Categorization of LPG Bottling Plant as Industrial Activity. LPG Bottling Plant Held to Be Manufacturing Activity Entitling Petitioner to HT I Industrial Tariff Under MERC Tariff Order.

The Petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, challenged the categorization of its LPG Gas Bottling Plant at Sangli under the HT II Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on Agreement. Court holds that stamp duty is a fiscal matter and not a bar to appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Lloyds Realty Developers Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment ...