Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Inclusion in Select List for Sub Station Assistant Post - Horizontal Reservation for Project Affected Persons Must Be Applied Correctly. The court directed MSEDCL to reconsider the petitioner's candidature for the post of Sub Station Assistant under OBC and PAP categories.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Pradeep Bapurao Mohite Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his exclusion from the select list for the post of Sub Station Assistant advertised by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL). The petitioner belongs to the Other Backward Class (OBC) category and also claims horizontal reservation as a Project Affected Person (PAP). He had completed apprenticeship training with MSEDCL from 2009 to 2011 and later worked as a Junior Operator on outsourcing basis. The respondent published an advertisement in June 2019 for 2000 posts of Sub Station Assistants, with 355 posts reserved for OBC category. The petitioner applied under the OBC and PAP categories but was not included in the select list. The court considered the petitioner's apprenticeship training and his work experience, and held that the horizontal reservation for PAP must be applied correctly. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's candidature and include his name in the select list if he is otherwise eligible. The petition was allowed with directions.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Horizontal Reservation - Project Affected Persons - The petitioner, an OBC candidate claiming horizontal reservation as a Project Affected Person, was excluded from the select list on the ground that he was not an apprentice of the respondent company. The court held that the horizontal reservation for PAP must be applied correctly and that the petitioner's apprenticeship training with the respondent company and subsequent work on outsourcing basis should be considered. (Paras 2-5)

B) Service Law - Selection Process - Eligibility Criteria - The court examined the advertisement and found that the petitioner met the eligibility criteria for the post of Sub Station Assistant, including the requirement of apprenticeship training. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's candidature and include his name in the select list if he is otherwise eligible. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner's exclusion from the select list for the post of Sub Station Assistant on the ground that he was not an apprentice of the respondent company is justified, and whether the horizontal reservation for Project Affected Persons was correctly applied.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner's candidature and include his name in the select list if he is otherwise eligible.

Law Points

  • Horizontal reservation
  • Project Affected Persons
  • OBC reservation
  • selection process
  • apprenticeship training
  • outsourcing basis
  • eligibility criteria
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (08) 9

Writ Petition No. 1736 of 2021

2023-08-18

Mangesh S. Patil, Shailesh P. Brahme

Ajay S. Deshpande for Petitioner, Anil S. Bajaj for Respondents

Pradeep Bapurao Mohite Patil

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited through its Managing Director and General Manager

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging exclusion from select list for public employment

Remedy Sought

Declaration that exclusion from selection process is bad and direction to include name in select list from OBC-PAP category

Filing Reason

Petitioner's name not included in select list for Sub Station Assistant post despite claiming OBC and PAP reservation

Issues

Whether the petitioner's exclusion from the select list on the ground of not being an apprentice of the respondent company is justified Whether the horizontal reservation for Project Affected Persons was correctly applied

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued he completed apprenticeship training with MSEDCL and worked on outsourcing basis, making him eligible Respondents argued petitioner was not an apprentice of the company and thus not eligible

Ratio Decidendi

Horizontal reservation for Project Affected Persons must be applied correctly, and the petitioner's apprenticeship training with the respondent company and subsequent work on outsourcing basis should be considered for eligibility.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner was an aspirant in the selection process undertaken by the respondents for the post of Sub Station Assistant. He has prayed for declaration that his exclusion from the selection process be held to be bad in law and the directions be issued to the respondents to include his name in the select list from Other Backward Class (OBC) – Project Affected Persons category.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1736 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, which was taken up for final hearing at the admission stage with consent of parties.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment to Widow Despite Government Policy on Family Size - Policy Cannot Override Humanitarian Considerations in Exceptional Circumstances
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSRTC Appeal and Allows Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Multiplier Corrected from 11 to 13 Based on Age of Injured Claimant. The court held that the multiplier should be based on the age of t...