Search Results for "maximum compensation"

840 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 840 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals and Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Vartun-2 Irrigation Scheme. Market Value Fixed at Rs. 8.50 per Sq. Mtr. Based on Comparable Sale Instance Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a group of first appeals filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by the original claimants (appellants) whose agri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death Not Arising Out of Employment. Deceased lineman died of heart attack while on duty but without any work-related strain; held not compensable under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a single judgment and award dated 23.11.2001 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Condition of Deposit of 25% Compensation for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Cases. Section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is procedural and applies to pending appeals; condition does not violate Article 21.

The petitioner, Ajay Vinodchandra Shah, was convicted in three separate cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for cheque bou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Interest Rate from 12% to 9% in Contractor's Recovery Suit Against State. The court held that interest under Section 34 CPC must be reasonable and not excessive, reducing the rate to 9% per annum.

The dispute arose out of a contract awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contractor, for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Contract Dispute Over Interest and Escalation Claims. Court holds that interest under Section 34 CPC is discretionary and that escalation claims not pleaded cannot be awarded.

The dispute arose out of a contract for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A in Goa awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contr...