Search Results for "inconclusive blood group"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence Under Section 302 IPC. Conviction Overturned as Last-Seen Testimony and Recoveries Failed to Form a Complete Chain Excluding Innocence, Applying Principles from Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda.

The appeal arose from a murder conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Homicide Alleged Under Sections 302, 201, 120B IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of Kiran Suryawanshi, who was married to accused No. 1 Monika. The prosecution alleged that Monika, along with accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Drainage Dispute Case. Common Intention Established for Assault with Sticks and Axes Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC.

The case arises from a dispute between two families over drainage water flowing from a cement road. About six months prior to the incident, there was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness, a child relative of the deceased, gave inconsistent and tutored testimony, and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Avinash @ Pinya Ashok Jadhav, was convicted by the 4th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, City Sessions Court, Sewree, Mumbai, for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Ornaments Not Sufficient to Prove Homicide.

The appellant, Sharad s/o Mariba Choudhari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of Sunita and for dishonestly taki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Pregnant Wife in Spearhead Blade Assault Case. Repeated Stab Wounds on Vital Parts Constitute Murder Under Section 302 IPC as Intention to Cause Death is Evident from Fatal Injury to Chest Puncturing Heart.

The appellant, Shiv Kisanlal Katare, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Laxmi, by the 2nd Adhoc Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence Found Inconsistent and Recovery Not Proved, Leading to Benefit of Doubt Under Sections 302 and 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Shayamrao Ramchandra Dhayagude, was convicted by the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur for offences punishable under Sections 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole reliance on chance witness identification without corroboration was unsafe.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three appellants (original accused nos. 1, 2, and 5) against their conviction under Section 302 read w...