Search Results for "illness"

582 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 582 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Brother Who Murdered Sister with Sickle in SC/ST Act Case — Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Suspicion of Immoral Character.

The appellant, Ravsaheb Shivappa Patil, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his sister Gourawwa by causing injuries with a sickle on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Parole Petition Due to Previous Abscondence and Discretionary Nature of Parole. Parole is a discretionary remedy granted only for specified contingencies like death or illness of relative, not for other reasons.

The petitioner, Gopal Hukka Bokshe, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of his application for parol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Resignation by Employee Who Resigned Under Mental Stress - Resignation Tendered During Mental Illness Not Voluntary. Employee Entitled to Reinstatement Without Back Wages as Resignation Was Not Voluntary Act.

The petitioner, Mrs. Saroj N. Patil, joined the services of the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. (NPCIL) as a Lower Division Clerk on 20th Sept...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Delay Condonation in Family Court Appeal — Wife's Claim for Half Share in Flat. Delay of 62 days condoned as applicant was pursuing remedy before Apex Court and was not negligent.

The applicant, Adhyatmam Bhamini, filed a delay condonation application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of 62 days de...