Search Results for "compensation under protest"

451 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 451 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.

The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landowners Challenge MIDC Over Land Classification and Compensation" "Petitioners demand reclassification and enhanced compensation for perennially-irrigated land."

The case involves a writ petition filed by Hiraman Yashwant Kathe and others challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. Compensation for playground land enhanced from Rs.30 to Rs.102 per sqm based on comparable sales and location advantages under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Village Panchayat of Collem, challenged the judgment and award dated 13.01.2010 passed by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Challenging Compensation Awards in Land Acquisition Matters. The Court Determined Market Value of Lands Acquired for a Minor Irrigation Tank in Kakhandaki Village, Bijapur District.

In the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Transport Contract Dispute, Holds Mutual Mistake Warrants Rectification of Contract Distance. Court Finds Actual Distance 307 km, Not 263 km as Stated in Work Order; Appellant Entitled to Claim for Excess Work Under Section 70 of Contract Act.

The dispute arose from a transport contract for emergency coal transportation from New Majri Colliery to Paras power station. The plaintiff, a transpo...