Search Results for "certified copy delay"

1367 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1367 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Cancellation of Revenue Entry in Fragmentation Case — Sale Deed Not Void Ab Initio. Revenue Authorities Cannot Cancel Entries After 17 Years Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Under Gujarat Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The petitioners, Kantibhai Bhagwanbhai Narola and others, purchased agricultural land bearing Revenue Survey No. 651 admeasuring 1 Acre 6 Gunthas and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Condonation of Delay Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 774 days not condoned as state failed to explain each day's delay with cogent evidence.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer and another applicant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 774 days ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Chamber Summons for Leave to Execute UK Judgment for Costs Against Judgment Debtor. Applicability of Section 44A CPC and Mandatory Notice Requirement under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC Considered.

The matter arose from a Chamber Summons in execution proceedings before the Bombay High Court, seeking leave to execute a foreign judgment and costs c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Application to Condoned Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. The court held that mere administrative delay without explanation for each day does not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The State of Gujarat, through the Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 822 Days. The court held that the State cannot claim benefit of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 when the delay is not properly explained and the application lacks sufficient cause.

The present applications were filed by the State of Gujarat through the Special Land Acquisition Officer seeking condonation of delay of 822 days in f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Applications by State in Land Acquisition Appeals Due to Unexplained Delay of 2014 Days. Delay of 2014 days in filing first appeal against land acquisition award not sufficiently explained, as state failed to provide cogent reasons for each day of delay.

The judgment pertains to a batch of civil applications filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Unit 1 and another (the State) under Section 5 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of 718-Day Delay in Filing Appeal by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Reference Cases. Delay Condoned Subject to Costs of Rs. 15,000 per Application Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, presided over by Honourable Mrs. Justice M. K. Thakker, delivered a common oral judgment on 16/01/2026 in a ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Application for Condonation of 1654 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Against Land Acquisition Award. Delay of 1654 days not sufficiently explained, and no case of substantial injustice made out to condone such inordinate delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The State of Maharashtra and its officers (applicants) filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Refusal to Condon 12-Year Delay in Restoration Application. Limitation Rules Apply Equally to Government; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

The dispute originated from a lease deed executed in 1951 for a bungalow in Pune Cantonment. The respondent (landlord) filed a civil suit in 1981 for ...