Search Results for "bill under protest"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "bill under protest"

252 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Refund Claim of CENVAT Credit as Time-Barred Under Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962 — Limitation Period Starts from Date of Payment of Duty, Not from Date of Final Assessment.

16 Oct 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Supertron Electronics Private Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to qu...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

4 Feb 2015

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Re-assessment of Ex-Bond Bills of Entry Based on Enhanced Tariff Value — Notification Effective Only from Time of E-Gazette Publication. Rate of duty determined at time of presentation under Section 15 of Customs Act, 1962; self-assessment completed before enhanced tariff value notification cannot be re-assessed.

28 Jun 2024

The petitioner, an importer, entered into four contracts with Just Oil & Grain Pte. Ltd., Singapore, for import of Crude Palm Oil. The goods arrived a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Charter Party Demurrage Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of Laytime and Demurrage Clauses. Court holds that Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not permit reappreciation of evidence or correction of errors of law unless award is patently illegal or perverse.

15 Jul 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Puyvast Chartering B.V. (owner) and M/s. Puyvast Maritime India Ltd. (agent), challenged an arbitral award dated 28 February 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in False Ceiling Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award on Certain Claims but Sets Aside Award on Claim for Price Escalation Due to Lack of Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms.

13 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an arbitral award dated 29 March 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Madras High Court Decrees Recovery of Port Charges in Favor of Chennai Port Trust Against Vessel Owner for Unpaid Berth Hire and Port Dues Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. The court held that the statutory charge under Section 64 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 attaches to the vessel and the purchaser is liable for pre-existing dues, and waiver granted to previous owner is not binding on the plaintiff.

23 Jan 2026

The plaintiff, Board of Trustees of the Port of Chennai, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,08,84,931/- with interest at 15% per annum from the defenda...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit by Consignee for Non-Delivery of Goods; Dubai Court Order Frustrated Contract of Affreightment. Non-delivery was due to a Dubai Court order attaching the cargo, which frustrated the contract of affreightment, absolving the defendants of liability.

13 Feb 2006

The case involved an admiralty suit filed by Bhatinda Chemicals Ltd., the consignee, against the vessel m.v. 'X-PRESS NUPTSE' and its owners, Fintas S...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Upholds Refund of Withheld EPF/ESI Amounts but Remits Liquidated Damages Issue for Reconsideration. The court held that the rejection of liquidated damages claim was patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while the award of refund of EPF/ESI deductions was not against public policy.

2 Jan 2026

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 01.07.2019. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)